Posts Tagged ‘bill gates’

Exerpt From Michael Neild’s “The Police State Road Map” [Chapter 14 – Population Control]

October 12, 2014 1 comment

Gradually, by selective breeding, the congenital differences between rulers and ruled will increase until they become almost different species. A revolt of the plebs would become as unthinkable as an organized insurrection of sheep against the practice of eating mutton.
Bertrand Russell, The Impact of Science on Society


      With the restraints of moral conventions and democracy dispensed with, the new utopia offers the holy grail of all dictators: Control over life itself. Yet some of that control has existed for decades in spite of our notionally free and democratic societies. Science offers the great advantage that very few people can understand it. Whoever pays for its conduct and its presentation in the popular media can dictate the consensus on any given issue, simply by asserting that his committee of experts are the most distinguished. The less well funded and represented dissenters are labeled the dangerous ‘quacks’ and ‘junk scientists’ and this is how the petrochemical-pharmaceutical cartel has killed, injured, and sterilized millions of people over the last hundred years. The same forces that supported Hitler have continued to operate covertly ever since.
Population control is multi-faceted. It includes: Reducing the number of people; eugenics; reducing intelligence levels; mind control; increasing poverty; and creating financial dependence on the pharmaceutical industry. Various facets of the population control agenda can be served simultaneously by the same device. Facing up to this 21st century holocaust merely requires an acknowledgement of the moral position of its elevated sponsors. Some might be unashamedly evil but most are Malthusians who believe that the there is no sanctity in human life. To ‘save the planet’ we must kill off most of the people, so said Jacques Cousteau in the UNESCO Courier of November 1991:

“The damage people cause to the planet is a function of demographics – it is equal to the degree of development. One American burdens the earth much more than twenty Bangladeshes … This is a terrible thing to say. In order to stabilize world population, we must eliminate 350,000 people per day. It is a horrible thing to say, but it’s just as bad not to say it.” (1)

Bertrand Russell, one of the twentieth century’s most eminent philosophers, said the same in his book, The Impact of Science on Society:

“At present the population of the world is increasing … War so far has had no great effect on this increase … I do not pretend that birth control is the only way in which population can be kept from increasing. There are others … If a Black Death could be spread throughout the world once in every generation, survivors could procreate freely without making the world too full…”(2)

Russell also supported the idea of engineering human beings to meet social requirements:


    Scientific societies are as yet in their infancy. . . . It is to be expected that advances in physiology and psychology will give governments much more control over individual mentality than they now have even in totalitarian countries. Fitche laid it down that education should aim at destroying free will, so that, after pupils have left school, they shall be incapable, throughout the rest of their lives, of thinking or acting otherwise than as their schoolmasters would have wished. . . . Diet, injections, and injunctions will combine, from a very early age, to produce the sort of character and the sort of beliefs that the authorities consider desirable, and any serious criticism of the powers that be will become psychologically impossible.
The Nazis were more scientific than the present rulers of Russia. . . . If they had survived, they would probably have soon taken to scientific breeding. Any nation which adopts this practice will, within a generation, secure great military advantages. The system, one may surmise, will be something like this: except possibly in the governing aristocracy, all but 5 per cent of males and 30 per cent of females will be sterilized. The 30 per cent of females will be expected to spend the years from eighteen to forty in reproduction, in order to secure adequate cannon fodder. As a rule, artificial insemination will be preferred to the natural method. . . .
    Gradually, by selective breeding, the congenital differences between rulers and ruled will increase until they become almost different species. A revolt of the plebs would become as unthinkable as an organized insurrection of sheep against the practice of eating mutton.” (3)


The progressively dumbed down society described in Brave New World is desirable to those in the ruling class who believe in ‘command and control’. However, with the internet serving as a counter-weight to official disinformation, we can now afford ourselves some protection against a health catastrophe we might otherwise endure at their hands.




     Displayed on Rockefeller University’s website homepage on 3 December 2003, was a picture of a crowded city market with the following caption beneath:


     It took from the beginning of time until 1950 to put the first 2.5 billion people on the planet. Yet in the next half-century, an increase that exceeds the total population of the world in 1950 will occur, So writes Joel E. Cohen, Ph.D., Dr.P.H., professor and head of the Laboratory of Populations at The Rockefeller University and Columbia University, in a Viewpoint article in the November 14 issue of the journal Science.(4) 


     Limiting population growth has been a preoccupation of the European and American elite throughout the twentieth century. The Population Council was established in 1952 by John D. Rockefeller III. The multi-billion dollar World Wildlife Fund is sponsored by British and Dutch Royalty and the elite environmental think-tank, The Club of Rome, counts several world leaders amongst its members. The U.N.’s population control activities receive funding from all the major charitable foundations, especially the Ford Foundation and Rockefeller Foundation. Ted Turner’s $1 billion United Nations Foundation and the $24 billion Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation are entirely devoted to population control activities although they are disguised as public health campaigns.
     The United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) is the single largest international source of overt funding for population and reproductive health programmes. Since it began operations in 1969, the Fund has provided nearly $6 billion in ‘assistance’ to developing countries.(5)The UNFPA only manages one quarter of the world’s population control budget for developing countries, which is in excess of $1 billion per year.(6) The Netherlands, Britain, and Japan were by far the biggest funders of UNFPA in 2001, providing almost 50% of the total $396 million.(7) Meanwhile the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) gives substantially more money to population control programmes than to healthcare and food assistance.(8) 




     The population control agenda is presented to the public as a universal concern for planetary resources and environmental pollution, and to a lesser degree, socio-economic deprivation, women’s rights, and reproductive health. Whatever the truth of these arguments, the point is that population ‘control’ is  coercive. The policy papers on population control contain objectives that are so extreme that coercion would certainly be needed to meet them. The 1972 benchmark environmentalist publication, The Limits To Growth, predicted planetary meltdown by 2050 unless radical limits to population growth were imposed. In 1974, this was translated into hard U.S. national security policy by National Security Advisor, Henry Kissinger. His lengthy National Security Study Memorandum 200 laid out the aims, timescale, and methods of U.S. foreign policy for limiting the population growth of ‘lesser developed countries’.(9) Measures were to be taken to keep the world’s population growing beyond 8 billion, meaning 500 million fewer people by year 2000 and 3 billion fewer by 2050. However, many suspect that this is nowhere near the real target of the elite and their Malthusian collaborators, which is to cut the world’s current population in half. The American population control think tank, Negative Population Growth Inc., recommended in 1992 that the population of the U.S. should be 125-150 million, requiring a 50% cut from its current level.(10) In 1995, the same think-tank published a study recommending an 80% reduction in global population. (11)
      In NSSM 200, Henry Kissinger stated that no single approach would ‘solve’ the population problem. Multiple and seemingly unconnected approaches are also less likely to attract attention. Here follows a short-list of these approaches.




     The environmental movement has been an important tool for justifying population reduction. As The Daily Telegraph recently reported, banning the pesticide DDT in the early 1970s was a huge victory for the population controllers. DDT was introduced as an insecticide in the 1940s and promised to eradicate malaria, one of the world’s biggest natural killers. Despite all the scientific evidence to the contrary, the powerful environmental lobby declared it dangerous, and so it was banned. As a result, hundreds of millions of lives have been lost to malaria unnecessarily.(12) Alexander King, president of the The Club of Rome, confirmed the real purpose of the ban:


     My own doubts came when DDT was introduced. In Guyana, within two years, it had almost eliminated malaria. So my chief quarrel with DDT,in hindsight, is that it has greatly added to the population problem.(13)






     The pharmaceutical industry is a multi-trillion dollar business, and healthcare spending consumes a significant proportion of Western GDP. One family in particular has played a key role in the development of the pharmaceutical industry – The Rockefellers. As described in chapters 2 and 4, the Rockefellers invested in the German chemical and pharmaceutical giant, I.G. Farben in the 1930s. Sterling Drug, Inc., was the main cog and largest holding company in the Rockefeller drug empire during the first half of the 20th Century.(14)Today, Rockefeller owned Bristol- Myers Squibb Inc. accounts for nearly half of the chemotherapy sales in the world.(15)
     The five leading private medical research institutes in the U.S. are either controlled by, or affiliated to, the Rockefellers: Rockefeller University, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, Aaron Diamond AIDS Research Center, Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Cold Spring Harbour Laboratories. These institutes conduct cutting edge medical research which affects the world’s entire health care system.


       A brief chronology of the establishment of health and educational institutions by John D. Rockefeller:


1889 -1909 The University of Chicago
1901 The Rockefeller Institute For Medical Research, now Rockefeller University
1909 Rockefeller Sanitary Commission for Eradication of Hookworm Disease
1910 In partnership with the Harriman family, funded the Station for Experimental Evolution and Eugenics Records Office in Cold Spring Harbour.
1914 The China Medical Board (16)


          The $65 million endowment of the Rockefeller Institute dwarfed the budget of the Public Health Service in the first three decades of 20th century.(17) Rockefeller University is a world leading centre for pharmaceutical medicine. Its website boasts:


     In its history, Rockefeller has been associated with 22 Nobel laureates and 18 Lasker Award recipients. Five faculty members have been named MacArthur Fellows and 11 have garnered the National Medal of Science, the highest science award given by the United States. And, 34 Rockefeller faculty are elected members of the National Academy of Sciences… Rockefeller forges collaborations with biotech and pharmaceutical companies as needed to speed research findings into development to improve patient care.(18)


     The world’s premier AIDS research institution, Aaron Diamond AIDS Research Centre, is affiliated to the Rockefeller University by academic, infrastructural, and administrative ties.(19) Established in 1991, ADARC is the world’s largest private research laboratory devoted solely to biomedical research on HIV/AIDS and is currently co-leading China’s largest AIDS ‘treatment programme’.(20) Rockefeller owned Time magazine voted their man at ADARC, Dr David Ho, ‘Man of The Year’ in 1996.
     The Howard Hughes Medical Institute has worked in partnership with the Rockefeller University since 1986.(21) Founded in 1953, at close of financial year 2002, Howard Hughes Medical Institute endowment was $10.3 billion making it the second largest philanthropy in the USA after the $24 billion Bill Gates Foundation.(22) HHMI currently employs seven Nobel prize winners. (23)  Current Trustees include James A Baker III and CEO of the Hughes Corporation, William R Lummis. In 1987 World Bank President, James D Wolfensohn, was elected as trustee. (24)
     The Rockefeller University has close ties with Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center.(25) During early 1970s Laurence S. Rockefeller sat on the board of the Memorial Sloan -Kettering Cancer Centre and was trustee of the Sloan Foundation.(26)The Rockefeller University archive reveals that the Rockefellers provided substantial endowment for Memorial Sloan-Kettering. The New York Cancer Hospital, founded in 1884, was one of the first hospitals devoted entirely to the research and treatment of cancer. Later known as the General Memorial Hospital for Cancer and Allied Diseases (1899-1916), and then as Memorial Hospital, it was vastly expanded and modernized in 1936 as a result of contributions by John D. Rockefeller II and the General Education Board. The Sloan foundation was founded in 1934 by Alfred P. Sloan Chairman of General Motors. In 1945, the Sloan-Kettering Institute was created to conduct intensive research in oncology. In 1960 the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center was formed to serve as an administrative umbrella for the hospital and institute.(27) Rockefeller’s modernization involved relocating Memorial to a new site just across the street from Rockefeller University. (28) Nelson A. Rockefeller was a Member of Westchester County (NY) Board of Health from January 1933 to June 1953.(29) Westchester became home to the Phelps Hospital founded in 1952 with Rockefeller money. With a donation of 66 acres on the Hudson River and $500,000 by the Arthur Curtis James Foundation, along with a pledge of $800,000 toward the project by John D. Rockefeller II, the new hospital was born.(30) The Phelps Hospital is now one of the sites of Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Centre.(31) James Robinson III, Chairman of the MSKCC board of Overseers and Managers, is also a director of Bristol-Myers Squibb. Richard Gelb, Vice-Chairman of the MSKCC board, is also Bristol-Myers Chairman of the Board. Richard Furlaud, another MSKCC board member, recently retired as Bristol-Myers’ president.(32)
     The Station for Experimental Evolution and The Eugenics Records Office was endowed with funds from the Rockefeller and Harriman families in 1910.(33) Since the 1970s, the re-named Cold Spring Harbour Laboratories have been home to the world’s cutting edge research programmes on cancer as well as research in neurobiology, plant genetics, genomics, and bioinformatics. James Watson, co-discoverer of DNA, was its Director from1969 to 1994 and it is undertaking work to map the human genome on behalf of The Human Genome Project.(34) The early research into eugenics at Cold Spring was mirrored by the Rockefellers’ funding of racial hygiene research in Germany at the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Psychiatry in Munich and The Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Anthropology, Eugenics, and Human Heredity in Berlin in the late 1920s.(35)
     However, the roots of this pharmaceutical stranglehold penetrate deep into the American education system. In 1910, a report was produced by the American Medical Association that changed the course of medical history. Previously, American medical education had been unregulated and suffered a bad reputation. Seeing an opportunity, the Carnegie Foundation offered to produce guidelines and qualifications for medical schools on behalf of the AMA. The Flexner Report, named after Abraham Flexner of the Carnegie Foundation, included recommendations to strengthen courses in pharmacology. Rockefeller and Carnegie then commenced to pour money into those institutions which conformed to the new requirements. To date, Rockefeller, Carnegie, Ford, Sloan, kellogg and other foundations have showered over a billion dollars on the medical schools of America. (36)
    According to The Drug Story by Maurice Bealle, an investigation into Rockefeller influence on medicine, the Rockefeller Foundation was the single largest contributor to American medical education:


   Harvard, with its well-publicized medical school, has received $8,764,433 of Rockefeller’s Drug Trust money, Yale got $7,927,800, Johns Hopkins $10,418,531, Washington University in St. Louis $2,842,132, New York’s Columbia University $5,424,371, Cornell University $1,709,072, etc., etc.(37)


     The Rockefellers and their alumni have held key positions directing American public health, and were directly involved with the establishment of American public health institutions. In 1938 Jewish German researchers fleeing Hitler were welcomed at the newly founded National Institutes of Health, built on a private estate in Bethesda donated by John D. Rockefeller.(38)This is still the home of the NIH today. Nelson A. Rockefeller was Under Secretary of Department of Health, Education, and Welfare from June 1953 to January 1955. Prior to this appointment he was Chairman, Special Committee on Defense Organization from February to April 1953 and afterwards, Consultant to Secretary of Defense on Organization of the Department of Defense from January to April 1958. Between January 1953 and December 1958 he was Chairman of the President’s Advisory Committee on Government Organization. Rockefeller took the HEW job to reorganize the health department to meet the secrecy requirements of U.S. biological, chemical, and nuclear weapons programme which required substantial testing on unwitting American and Canadian citizens, as described in the section on AIDS below.(39) Laurence S. Rockefeller was also on the board of the Community Blood Council of Greater NY, funded by the Sloan Foundation. (40) Rockefeller University faculty boasts 34 National Academy of Science members and eight of the New York Academy of Sciences’ Council currently work for Rockefeller connected companies or institutions. (41)




     Charges of genocide against the Drugs Trust are appropriate on three counts: 1) Most pharmaceuticals do not cure diseases; 2) Pharmaceuticals kill and injure vast numbers of people; 3) Pharmaceuticals are forced upon the public by governments and effective alternatives are denied.
     Given the first two charges, it might seem impossible for the third to be accomplished in a free society. This is how it’s done: 1) Laws and regulations controlling medical treatments, mainly administered by agencies such as the Food and Drug Administration in the U.S. and The Medicines Control Agency in the U.K. mandate which treatments are safe, effective, and legal; 2) Professional medical associations who licence doctors dictate what treatments can be prescribed; 3) The British and European model of socialized medicine allows the government health departments to decide health policy and purchase treatment on behalf of the public which very rarely includes non-drug based treatments; 4) Medical research bodies controlled by the Drugs Trust and the government, influence the policies of the previous three. 1, 2, and 3 are the enforcement arm of the cartel whilst method 4 is the propaganda arm. In this way western public health-care system is the epitome of fascism: The corporations use government to enforce a cartel at the expense of the public interest.
     Recent articles in the mainstream media and medical journals have revealed the tip of the public death-care iceberg. Killing 250,000 patients a year, doctors are the third leading cause of death in the U.S. according to the Journal of American Medical Association.(42)
     A recent editorial in The Lancet  (Vol. 359, No. 9313; 2002) warned of the corruption of Western medicine by drug companies. The editors of this most esteemed scientific journal asked, “Just how tainted has medicine become [by pharmaceutical industry payoffs]?” They concluded, “Heavily, and damagingly so,” urging “doctors who support this culture for the best of intentions” to “have the courage to oppose practices that bring the whole of medicine into disrepute.” (43)Up to half the articles on drugs which appear in mainstream medical journals are written by ghost writers employed by drug companies not the named authors.(44)
     Congressman Dan Burton has been investigating vaccines for four years as Chairman of the Dan Burton Committee on Government Reform on The Status of Research into Vaccine Safety and Autism. He believes that conflicts of interest at the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) are a problem, particularly on the vaccine advisory panel:


     This presents a real paradox when the CDC routinely allows scientists with blatant conflicts of interest to serve on influential advisory committees that make recommendations on new vaccines, as well as policy matters… All the while these same scientists have financial ties, academic affiliations, and other vested interests in the products and companies for which they are supposed to be providing unbiased oversight.(45)


     Dr Matthias Rath, research colleague of Nobel Laureate Linus Pauling and Director of Cardiovascular Research at the Linus Pauling Institute in Palo Alto, California, is a world expert in nutritional medicine.(46) On 14th June 2003, Dr Rath filed a complaint at the International Criminal Court in The Hague against the pharmaceutical industry. The charges brought were ‘genocide’ and other ‘crimes against humanity’, committed in connection with the pharmaceutical industry’s business with disease:


     The accused willfully and systematically maintain cardiovascular diseases, including high blood pressure, heart failure, diabetic complications and other diseases, cancer, infectious diseases including AIDS, osteoporosis and many other of today’s most common diseases that are recognized to be largely preventable by natural means. The accused have deliberately caused the unnecessary suffering and premature death of hundreds of millions of people. The accused systematically and deliberately prevent the eradication of cardiovascular disease, cancer and other diseases by obstructing and blocking the dissemination of life-saving information on the health benefits of natural non-patentable therapies. Thereby, the accused have deliberately caused further unnecessary suffering and the premature death of hundreds of millions of people. The accused deliberately and systematically expand existing diseases and creating new diseases by manufacturing and marketing pharmaceutical drugs with short-term symptomatic relief but with known and detrimental long-term side-effects. Thereby the accused have deliberately caused further unnecessary suffering and premature death of hundreds of millions of people. (47)


     In 1996 the U.N. Codex Alimentarius Commission launched a world-wide initiative to restrict access to natural medicines. The Codex has been translated into hard law by the E.U.(48) In August 2005, The European Food Supplements Directive will become law across the E.U. including the U.K.. This will remove over 5000 vitamin formulations from U.K. shops and dramatically cut the dosage of many others. The Herbal Medicines Directive under consideration by the European Parliament will prevent any new herbal formulas ever coming onto the market and remove any herbal product which hasn’t had a proven track record in the E.U.. The Pharmaceuticals Directive seeks to expand the scope of the drug classification. In its current wording even food or water can be included as a substance which ‘restores, corrects, or modifies physiological functions’.
     The banning of over-the-counter natural medicine will create a two tier planetary health system as the E.U. laws are imposed in other countries under World Trade Organization ‘harmonization’ rules which will include America. Natural Medicines will be available on prescription only for those that can afford to pay for private consultations whilst the state-run health-care systems will continue to prescribe pharmaceuticals to the public. In this way, the elite will blatantly deny most people access to ground-breaking life-extension herbal and vitamin formulations that they themselves will continue to enjoy.
     Dr Rath states that ‘No sinister dark men stand behind the unethical plans of the ‘Codex Alimentarius” commission, but unscrupulous shareholders and investors of the pharmaceutical industry bank on it’. (49) However, the controlling stake in the pharmaceutical industry is held by the same tiny cabal that controls all other major industries. They are committed to planetary de-population as their policy papers show. It is not, therefore, just about making money.
    A challenge to the E.U. Food Supplements Directive is currently being mounted in the European Court of Justice by the Alliance for Natural Health (see


14.5 CANCER 


Relevant articles >> 1



     One in three Europeans and one in two Americans will get cancer. Ten million people a year die of cancer worldwide.(50) Despite the trillions of dollars spent on orthodox research and treatment for cancer, the medical establishment is no further forward in finding a cure. The reason is, of course, that the cancer industry is a hugely profitable population control programme which depends upon patented drugs. World Without Cancer: The Story of Vitamin B17, by G. Edward Griffin, was first published in 1974. The foreword to the 1997 edition states that absolutely nothing has changed since then, except the actors in the plot.
    The book details the astonishing fraud and cover-up of the effectiveness of vitamin B17 (laetrile), not least by the Rockefellers’ Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Centre. For five years between 1972 and 1977 the effectiveness of laetrile was tested by Dr Kanematsu Sugiara at MSKCC. On 13 June 1973, he produced a report which strongly indicated its anti-cancer properties. This did not please his employer, who then set about denigrating his findings, saying that noone else could reproduce them. By 1977, the propaganda war was won. However in November 1997, Ralph Moss,the Assistant Director of Public Affairs who wrote the propaganda, did an extraordinary thing. He held his own press conference at which he named the MSKCC officials who had collaborated in the massive laetrile cover-up. He was fired the next day, but the media soon forgot all about it. (51)
    Since the FDA banned laetrile in 1971, thousands of Americans have traveled to Mexico and Germany every year to be treated with it. American doctors can have their licences taken away for prescribing it, or even face imprisonment in California due to its ‘anti-quack’ cancer legislation. In the U.K., it is illegal for anyone other than registered medical practitioners to claim they can cure or treat cancer.(52) Unfortunately it is the Rockefeller/I.G. Farben monopoly treatment of cancer which is quackery: there is no evidence that chemotherapy or radiotherapy increase life expectancy. In fact both are extremely toxic and often lethal treatments which themselves destroy the patient’s immune system and cause cancer and death.
     Dr. Lorraine Day is an internationally acclaimed orthopedic trauma surgeon and best selling author. She spent 15 years on the faculty of the University of California School of Medicine in San Francisco as Associate Professor and Vice Chairman of the Department of Orthopedics. She was also Chief of Orthopedic Surgery at San Francisco General Hospital and is recognized worldwide as an AIDS expert. Ten years ago, she contracted breast cancer and reached the terminal stage. However she refused orthodox treatment and devised for herself a ten point plan which didn’t involve drugs or even vitamin supplements. Knowing that cancer is the consequence of a dysfunctional immune system, poor diet, and lifestyle and environmental factors, she cured herself by addressing these issues. Dr. Day, like many thousands of others, is alive and well today by taking matters into her own hands. She is roundly attacked in the mainstream press for her crusade against the fraud of the cancer industry and the drug industry in general. Pictures of her tumor can be seen at




     It seems illogical that self-proclaimed population control advocates would spend billions of dollars on vaccination programmes trying to save the lives of millions of people in the Third World. The grim reality is that they are covertly murdering and sterilizing these poor people under the guise of public health. Launched in 1999, The Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization is a partnership of the who’s who in population control: The Rockefeller Foundation, the $24 billion Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the United Nations Foundation ( a $1 billion endowment by Ted Turner), The World Bank, The World Health Organization and Western governments.(53)
      The stated mission of GAVI and the Vaccine Fund, is to ensure that ‘all the world’s children have equal access to lifesaving vaccines’. Unfortunately, the more malnourished a child is the more likely it is to suffer a severe reaction to immune-suppressing vaccinations, especially when they are given in combination. Even the American Vaccination Adverse Event Reporting Systems (VAERS) set up in 1990, gives some indication of the carnage caused by vaccines. 90% of all adverse reactions go un-reported to VAERS and chronic conditions which emerge months or years later, such as autism, autoimmune diseases, allergies, cancer, and neurodevelopment disorders, are not officially recognized as consequences of vaccinations anyway.(54) The report by United Press International should be read bearing this in mind:


     As of the end of last year, the system contained 244,424 total reports of possible reactions to vaccines, including 99,145 emergency room visits, 5,149 life-threatening reactions, 27,925 hospitalizations, 5,775 disabilities, and 5,309 deaths, according to data compiled by Dr. Mark Geier, a vaccine researcher in Silver Spring, Md. The data represents roughly 1 billion doses of vaccines, according to Geier. (55)


     An investigative report by Roman Bystrianyk for, shows that there is little epidemiological evidence for the contribution of vaccines to the widescale reduction in death rates from infectious diseases.(56) The Vital Statistics of the United States, published by the Bureau of the Census and the U.S. Dept. of Health, contain death rates from infectious diseases. From 1900 to 1963, when the measles vaccine was introduced, death rates from measles had declined from 13.3 per 100,000 to 0.2 per 100,000 – a 98% decrease. From 1900 to 1949, death rates from whooping cough declined from 12.2 per 100,000 to 0.5 per 100,000 – a 96% decrease. From 1900 to 1949, death rates from diphtheria declined from 40.3 per 100,000 to 0.4 per 100,000 – a 99% decrease.       


fig. 1: Death rates from infectious diseases in the U.S.


    Mortality data in England and Wales provided by the Office of National Statistics in 1997 shows an identical picture. From 1850 to 1968, when the measles vaccine was introduced, death rates from measles had declined from a range of 52.11 to 26.6 per 100,000 to 0.11 per 100,000 – a range of 99.6% to 99.8% decrease. From 1860 to 1955, death rates from whooping cough declined from a range of 43.73 to 60.86 per 100,000 to 0.2 per 100,000 – a 99.5% to 99.7% decrease.
    Also note that scarlet fever and typhoid were eliminated in both countries without any vaccination programme.
    Public health experts have long recognized these facts. Thomas McKeown was Professor of Social Medicine in the University of Birmingham Medical School between 1950 and 1978. He is still regarded as a major social philosopher of medicine, and known for his important works on epidemiology and the practice and purpose of medicine. His conclusion was that infectious diseases were declining well before widespread vaccination:


    The distinguished epidemiologist Thomas McKeown (1912-1988) maintained that reductions in deaths associated with infectious diseases (air-, water-, and food-borne diseases) cannot have been brought about by medical advances, since such diseases were declining long before effective means were available to combat them.


   A paper published in the premier medical journal, The Lancet, in January1977 by the Department of Community Medicine, also indicated that vaccinations were not responsible for the decline in mortality:


    Vaccination, beginning on small scale in some places around 1948 and on a national scale in 1957, did not affect the rate of decline if it be assumed that one attack usually confers immunity, as in most major communicable diseases of childhood. … The steady decline of whooping cough between 1930 and 1957 is predictive of a linear exponential decay characteristic of a general and progressive lessening in the volume and spread of infection among the susceptible population. With this pattern well established before 1957, there is no evidence that vaccination played a major role in the decline in incidence and mortality in the trend of events


   An even a more recent editorial statement from the Journal of Pediatrics in December 1999 declared that proper sanitation was largely responsible for the early large declines in infectious diseases:


    ...the largest historical decrease in morbidity and mortality caused by infectious disease was experienced not with the modern antibiotic and vaccine era, but after the introduction of clean water and effective sewer systems.


    Again, in the August 2001 edition of the American Journal of Infection Control, epidemiologists concluded that,


    except for the smallpox vaccination, which was introduced in 1798 and made compulsory in England in 1853, the overall contribution of medical innovations to the health revolution of the 1800s is difficult to validate. Diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis vaccine arrived on the scene only after disease mortality rates already had been reduced significantly; measles, rubella, and polio vaccines did not become available until the middle of the 20th century




     Because they do not trigger a proper immune response, vaccinations give live viruses and other live vaccine contaminants a headstart in the body. Normally microorganisms have to pass through the mucous membranes in the mouth and gastro-intestinal tract which are lined with Immunoglobulin A. Interaction with IgA triggers a cellular immune response which precedes the antibody/humoral response. Injected microorganisms bypass the mucousal /cellular immune system and directly trigger the antibody-producing plasma cells in the bone marrow. This is why vaccine manufactures add immune system stimulating ‘adjuvants’ such as aluminium, lipopolysacchride and squalene. Live microorganisms also take advantage of significant immune suppression caused by the vaccination itself. Research found that 20% of measles vaccines recipients have chronic measles infections in their brains later in life indicating that live virus vaccines create greater risk of developing the disease.(57) In the New England Journal of Medicine of July 1994, a study found that over 80% of children under 5 years of age who had contracted whooping cough had been fully vaccinated against it. (58)
     Dr. Archie Kalokerinos is a Life Fellow of the Royal Society for Health, a Fellow of the International Academy of Preventive Medicine, Fellow of the Australasian College of Biomedical Scientists, Fellow of the Hong Kong Medical Technology Association, and a Member of the New York Academy of Sciences. In 1978 he was awarded the A.M.M.(Australian Medal of Merit) for ‘outstanding scientific research’. On the subject of vaccines he comments:


     My final conclusion after forty years or more in this business [medicine] is that the unofficial policy of the World Health Organization and the unoffical policy of the ‘Save the Children’s Fund’ and… [other vaccine promoting] organizations is one of murder and genocide… I cannot see any other possible explanation… You cannot immunize sick children, malnourished children, and expect to get away with it. You’ll kill far more children than would have died from natural infection.”It was similar with the measles vaccination. They went through Africa, South America and elsewhere, and vaccinated sick and starving children… They thought they were wiping out measles, but most of those susceptible to measles died from some other disease that they developed as a result of being vaccinated. The vaccination reduced their immune levels and acted like an infection. Many got septicaemia, gastro-enteritis, etc, or made their nutritional status worse and they died from malnutrition. So there were very few susceptible infants left alive to get measles. It’s one way to get good statistics, kill all those that are susceptible, which is what they literally did.”(59) 


     American children receive up to forty vaccinations before the age of two. Dr. H.H. Fudenberg, world-renowned immunologist with hundreds of publications to his credit, made the following comments:


    One vaccine decreases cell-mediated immunity by 50%, two vaccines by 70%…all triple vaccines (MMR, DTaP) markedly impair cell-mediated immunity, which predisposes to recurrent viral infections.(60)


    Like HIV, the measles virus is particularly immune suppressing hence the danger of the live virus measles vaccine. In 2001, GAVI launched an initiative to vaccinate all 200 million children in sub-Saharan Africa against measles, despite the fact that HIV infection is rampant there.(61)


     As well as the dangerous assault on fragile immune systems by the vaccine’s active ingredients, there are live contaminants in vaccines. Microorganism contamination, is a relatively common finding in many commercial vaccines. One study in the journal Vaccine in 1986, found that ~6% of commercial vaccines tested were contaminated with a tiny bacteria called mycoplasma. Most U.S.military personnel deployed to the Gulf in 1990 received up to 30 vaccinations in a two to three day period, some probably experimental and administered without proper informed consent. Recent studies by the Institute of Molecular Medicine found that ~40% of veterans with Gulf War Illness were infected with mycoplasma fermentans.(62)100% of Gulf War Illness patients who developed the motor neuron disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, tested positive for systemic mycoplasma infection.(63)
    The polio vaccine administered to thirty million Americans during the late fifties and early sixties was  contaminated with the monkey virus SV40. This is believed to be responsible for an epidemic of cancers.(64) When SV40 was discovered in rhesus monkey kidney cells during the early 1960s, the manufacturers switched rapidly to cells from African green monkeys. However Dr John Martin, an FDA scientist discovered in 1972 that these cells were also contaminated, this time with a cytomegalovirus. To date his requests to have the vaccine properly tested have gone unanswered by the FDA because the manufacturers can hide behind ‘proprietary interests’. Dr Martin now works as an independent researcher studying the role of this ‘stealth’ virus in whole range of chronic debilitating illnesses. (65)




     The World Health Organization has a twenty year history of developing contraceptive vaccines. These work by creating immunity to the body’s own fertility hormone, human chorionic gonadotrophin (HcG).(66) A BBC documentary entitled Horizon: The Human Laboratory aired 5 November 1995, revealed that the W.H.O. started using these vaccines to sterilize women in the mid 1990s. They got caught giving it to women without informed consent in the Philippines, by putting in the tetanus shots.(67)(68) After the recipients of the vaccine started having miscarriages a study conducted by the Philippine Medical Association on behalf of the Philippine Department of Health revealed that almost 20 percent of the tetanus vaccine sampled positive for HcG. 
  A UNICEF campaign to vaccinate Nigeria’s youth against polio may have been a front for sterilizing the nation, according to Dr. Haruna Kaita, a pharmaceutical scientist. In March 2004 he reported that, using WHO-recommended technologies like Gas Chromatography (GC) and Radio-Immuno assay, he found evidence of serious contamination. “Some of the things we discovered in the vaccines are harmful, toxic; some have direct effects on the human reproductive system,” he said. Asked why he thought manufacturers would do this, he replied:


    These manufacturers or promoters of these harmful things have a secret agenda which only further research can reveal. Secondly they have always taken us in the third world for granted, thinking we don’t have the capacity, knowledge and equipment to conduct tests that would reveal such contaminants. And very unfortunately they also have people to defend their atrocities within our midst, and worst still some of these are supposed to be our own professionals who we rely on to protect our interests. (69)




Relevant articles >> 1, 2



    First manufactured in the 1930s, thimerosal is a mercury compound containing 49.6% ethyl mercury by weight. Since then it has been used in some multi-dose vaccines as a preservative. Autism was relatively uncommon before 1990, averaging around 1 in 10,000 American children. Today it averages 1 in 150. (70) 7 out of 10 autistic children have an I.Q below 70 points, low enough to create ‘learing difficulties’. Congressman Dan Burton predicts that if current trends continue, there could be 4 million autistic Americans in the next decade. (71) Researchers believe that when the number of vaccines given to children was increased in 1990, the public health agencies failed to take into account the cumulative mercury exposure.
        A United Press International investigation into the vaccine controversy reported that, depending on what vaccines a child got during that period, a visit to the doctor during the 1990s may have exposed some children to 125 times the limit on mercury set by the Environmental Protection Agency. Since the mid-1980s the CDC has doubled the number of vaccines children get, up to nearly 40 doses before age 2. (72) On 7 July 1999, The American Academy of Pediatrics and the U.S. Public Health Service issued a joint statement calling for the removal of thimerosal from vaccines following a risk assessment by the FDA. Although manufacturers did take steps to remove it from many vaccines, there is no requirement for them to do so because the CDC will not take action. Dr. Mark Geier, an expert witness on vaccine cases, states that major manufacturers are still using thimerosal and that children were being injected with more mercury than ever in 2003.(73) Fluzone by Aventis Pasteur, is provided in multi-dose vials that still contain 25mcg of thimerosal, 25 times the safe level of mercury suggested by the FDA.(74) For this reason, Congressman Dan Burton and Dave Weldon have introduced Bills to ban thimerosal use in vaccines.
    The Insitute of Medicine, which advises the CDC on this issue, refuses to acknowledge the dangers of thimerosal. This is in spite of Dr Mark Gaier’s study published in the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons in April 2003(75) which concluded that there is a strong link between thimerosal exposure and neurodevelopment disorders such as autism, speech impediments, and attention deficit disorder. Gaier noted that one in eight American children requires special education due to brain impairment and that number is expected to rise to one in five.
    In February 2000, Dr Thomas Verstraeten of the National Immunization Program of the CDC produced an analysis of the CDC’s Vaccine Safety Datalink, a patient record database that includes information on children vaccinated who developed neurological disorders. These findings were never made public but they were discussed at a secret CDC conference held on 7-8th June , 2000 at the Simpsonwood Retreat Center, Norcross, Georgia. This was top level assembly of 51 scientists and physicians, of which five represented vaccine manufacturers (Glaxosmithkline, Merck, Wyeth, North American Vaccine and Aventis Pasteur). Minutes of this conference were obtained by Congressman David Weldon through a freedom of information request.(76) Verstraeten’s findings showed a risk of autism 2.48 times greater for infants who received the highest amounts of mercury in vaccines. The delegates agreed that these findings should be kept secret and went on to discuss how they could manipulate the data to conceal the association.
    In November 2003, Verstraeten et al. published a study in Pediatrics which denied the association. The Journal did not disclose the fact that since the meeting in 2000, Verstraten had been working for Glaxosmithkline. In December 2003, Congressman Weldon got Dr. Mark Gaier access to the same Datalink database and he was able to conclude that the earlier findings were correct. (77)




    Dr Russell Blayock is a neurosurgeon and expert on excitotoxins. He warns that mercury is not the only vaccine additive which can cause brain damage including autism.(78)(79) Substances called adjuvants are added to vaccines in order to stimulate an immune response. These include squalene, aluminium, and lipopolysacchride. The problem with current heavy vaccination schedules is that these substances remain in the tissues, continually stimulating the immune system. This is particularly bad for the brain because its immune system cells called microglia, once activated, begin to move about the nervous system, secreting numerous immune chemicals (called cytokines and chemokines) and pouring out an enormous amount of free radicals in an effort to kill invading organisms. The problem is, there are no invading organisms. It has been tricked by the vaccine into believing there are. Unlike the body’s immune system, the microglia also secrete two other chemicals that are very destructive of brain cells and their connecting processes. These chemicals, glutamate and quinolinic acid, are called excitotoxins. They also dramatically increase free radical generation in the brain. Studies of patients have shown that levels of these two excitotoxins can rise to very dangerous levels in the brain following viral and bacterial infections of the brain. High quinolinic acid levels in the brain are thought to be the cause of the dementia seen with HIV infection.
    A recent study by the world-renowned immunologist Dr. H. Hugh Fudenberg, found that adults vaccinated yearly for five years in a row with the flu vaccine had a 10-fold increased risk of developing Alzheimer’s disease. He attributes this to the mercury and aluminum in the vaccine. Interestingly, both of these metals have been shown to activate microglia and increase excitotoxicity in the brain.




     In the early 1970s the medical establishment came up with a diagnosis of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) and Shaken Baby Syndrome (SBS) to hide the fact that vaccines might be killing thousands of babies all over the world every year. After their baby fell victim in 1997, Alan and Francine Yurko launched The Yurko Project, to expose the real cause of their son’s death. (80) They successfully rallied an army of scientists and doctors from around the world and overturned Alan Yurko’s wrongful conviction for shaking his son to death in August 2004, after he had spent seven years in prison. A series of high profile cases in the U.K. have thrown the whole diagnoses of shaken baby syndrome and other spurious allegations of infanticide into disrepute.(81)(82)(83)
    Most of the parents who contact the Yurko Project for help state that their child’s problems began within days of vaccination. This reflects the official data on SIDS and SBS. There are approximately 2500 SIDS cases and 1300 SBS cases per year in the U.S.. The Center for Disease control acknowledges that the peak age for SIDS – 2 to 4 months- coincides with the first round of vaccinations. (84)The bacterial vaccines which contain endotoxin, DTaP and Hib, are particularly suspect. In its latest review, The Institute of Medicine has been unable to rule out the connection between DtaP and SIDS.(85) The mean average age for SBS cases is 2.2 months.(86)




     The connection between vaccination and inflammatory disease is strong. Inflammatory diseases plaguing Western nations include: Type one diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, asthma, hay fever and other allergies, multiple sclerosis, Guillain-Barre, amyotrophic-lateral- sclerosis/motor neuron disease, Stevens-Johnson’s syndrome, Lupus, Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, Huntington’s, Crohn’s colitis and irritable bowel syndrome.
    In the U.S., asthma in children has doubled in the last twenty years coinciding with the doubling of childhood vaccines. (87)  
    In New Zealand there was a 60% increase in juvenile diabetes following a massive hepatitis B vaccination programme for newborns. In Finland the incidence of juvenile diabetes increased 147% in children under five after the introduction of three new vaccines for children in the late 1970s. Then in the late 1980s addition of a live MMR vaccine and an experimental vaccine (Hib) resulted in another 62% increase in the incidence of juvenile diabetes in children 3 months or older who received the new multiple vaccines. Interestingly, a former NIH investigator, Dr. J. B. Classen, has proposed that the increase in type 1 juvenile diabetes associated with multiple childhood vaccines may be avoidable by changing the regimen by which multiple vaccines are given in childhood.(88)
      Merck & Co.’s documentation on the adverse reactions to its Hepatitis B vaccine is published in the Physician’s Desk Reference. Some of the inflammatory and autoimmune diseases listed include Guillain-Barre, multiple sclerosis, arthritis, lupus and Stevens-Johnson’s syndrome.(89)
   In 1998, France became the first country to terminate a hepB vaccine program. The French Ministry of Health acted when complaints of multiple sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis and other illnesses in patients who received the hepB vaccine were reported. Up to 900 cases of MS may have been linked to the vaccine. (90)
    Immunization with the recombinant hepatitis B vaccine trebles the risk of developing multiple sclerosis according to new U.S. research based on UK statistics. Published in Neurology, a study by the Harvard School of Public Health estimated that HBV immunization was associated with a 3-fold increase in incidence of MS within 3 years. (91)
      The 2002 the ‘Madsen study’ of 537,304 children in Denmark concluded that there was no link between the MMR vaccine and autism. This study is cited by public health agencies around the world as definitive proof that MMR is safe. However in Autumn 2004, an article was published which contradicted these findings.The Madsen study monitored the progress of vaccinated children in Denmark for only four years. Dr Fouad Yazbak and Dr G S Goldman looked at the same data but over a longer period of time and found that prevalence of autism among children aged from 5 to 9 stood at 8.38 cases per 100,000 in the pre-vaccine years 1980 to 1986, and then rose to 71.43 cases by the year 2000. (92)(93)
     SmithKline Beecham produced a vaccine for Lyme disease called Lymerix in 1996. By October 2000 it had been given to 1.4 million people according to the Centers for Disease Control. However, the company pulled the vaccine off the market in February 2002 after large numbers of recipients developed chronic arthritic symptoms.(94) 
     The science of immunology is extremely complex but vaccination critics believe that the fundamental problem with vaccines is the injection of foreign substances directly into the body. Heavy childhood vaccination schedules may permanently skew the immune system towards a humoral response. Immune systems biased towards humoral immunity are associated with autoimmune diseases and allergies.
     Autoimmune diseases can also be caused by the virus itself as well as by modification to the cellular/humoral balance of the immune system. Viruses and other live vaccine contaminants such as mycoplasmas frequently have surface proteins which are similar to those in the human body, particularly in the brain and nervous system.(95) It is well established in the scientific literature that genes can be transferred between microorganisms and human cells. Any slight genetic changes to the surface proteins of human cells by genetic transfer from microorganisms or vice-versa can lead to an autoimmune response. (96) (97)




    Many adverse reactions to vaccines can prove fatal in the long term. Dr. Russell Blayock points out the relationship between inflammatory disease and cancer. Medical research found that 76% of cancer patients had developed an inflammatory disease 7-13 years before.(98) These findings were the cover story of Time Magazine on 23 February 2004. Inflammation produces large amounts of free-radicals that damage DNA. (99)




    In July 2004, The Independent newspaper reported that vaccines which block sensations of euphoria associated with narcotics and smoking are under development. The British Government has backed the research in the hope that soon, doctors will be able to vaccinate children to prevent them experiencing the pleasure associated with taking drugs. Given that vaccines are already strongly suspected of reducing childrens’ intelligence, any attempt to interfere with their emotional responses has to be viewed with concern. Will the new vaccines create a generation of emotionally impotent automatons? Orwell predicted that The Party would abolish the orgasm, after all. (100)




     America’s consumption of psychotropic drugs is so great that Prozac has made its way into the water supply and is contaminating fresh water fish. Not satisfied with this achievement, in July 2004, President Bush’s ‘New Freedom Commission on Mental Health’ recommended screening all American school children for mental illness with a view to possible treatment with new antidepressants and anti-psychotic drugs. George Bush sr. sits on the board of Eli Lilly, which manufactures Zyprexa, one of the anti-psychotics recommended by the Commission. (101)(102)
        Ritalin is prescribed to about two million American children. It has become the standard way for teachers and parents to deal with unruly children even to the point where children are being threatened with expulsion or being taken into care if they do not take it.(103) Ritalin is an ideal mind control drug because it suppresses the natural energy and spirit of young people often leaving them robotic, lethargic, depressed, or withdrawn. It also introduces the idea at an early age that drugs are an acceptable way of dealing with social problems.
     Europe is not being left behind on the quest for ‘soma’. Nearly one in four French people are on tranquillizers, antidepressants, anti psychotics, or other mood-altering prescription drugs. An average of 40% of men and women aged over 70 in France were routinely prescribed at least one of this class of dependence-creating drug, as well as some 4% of all children under nine.(104)
    As discussed in chapter 11, the U.K. draft Mental Health Bill creates powers to compel medication for a whole range of ‘disorders of the mind.’
   Prozac and other SSRIs are capable of inducing psychosis and suicidal depression. In the U.K., certain SSRIs have recently been banned from being prescribed to children after a string of suicides. The active ingredient in prozac and many other drugs is fluoride, which has been linked to brain damage and loss of I.Q. (see Fluoride below).




    The future of mind control and even body control, lies in electronic implants which are currently under development. The U.S. military-directed research of implantable microchips and their war fighting applications was discussed earlier in Chapter 12. Some recent news articles describe medical applications of microchips with mind and body control potential. The BBC reported that patients with chronic migraines could one day have an electric device implanted into their foreheads to control the pain. Doctors in the United States have already used the treatment successfully on one woman, who was suffering from constant headaches.(105) The BBC also reported that U.S scientists writing in Nature Materials describe a drug-containing microchip which can be implanted in the body. This releases the medication slowly so the patient no longer has to take any pills. (106)
     With satellite linked implantable microchips being developed by Applied Digital Solutions Inc., the prospect of remote controlled medical implants may not be too distant.




     Congressman Dennis Kucinich’s 2001 Preservation of Space Act calls for a ban on:


      the use of land-based, sea-based, or space-based systems using radiation, electromagnetic, psychotronic, sonic, laser, or other energies directed at individual persons or targeted populations for the purpose of information war, mood management, or mind control of such persons or populations.


     Kucinich was refering to technologies he had learned about during his chairmanship of the House Armed Services Oversight Committee.
     Private researchers, such as Dr. Nick Begich, have turned up some remarkably frank discussions of mind control published by the U.S. Military. The Mind Has No Firewall, by Timothy L. Thomas, published in the spring 1998 issue of the U.S Army War College’s quarterly Parameters, describes decades of research in the U.S. and Soviet Union focused on manipulating human behaviour. Propaganda is considered a key tool of psychotronic warfare, including tactics such as ‘information overload’. Certain electronic devices are completely undetectable, e.g. the “Russian Virus 666” which can broadcast subliminal images. This can put viewers of television or computer screens into a trance and change their perceptions.
    Dr. Begich obtained documents from the Scientific Advisory Board of the Air Force in which researchers envisage the development of electromagnetic weapons which can prevent voluntary muscular movements, control emotions, produce sleep, interfere with memory, and delete experience. Russian army Major I. Chernishev writing in the military journal Orienteer of February1997, describes the development of a pyschotronic generator capable of broadcasting through telephone lines, TV, radio networks, supply pipes, and incandescent lights.(107) Even more disturbing is the use of high power microwaves in the gigahertz range to beam sounds directly into human brains and literally talk to them. As early as 1933, Soviet scientists had discovered that microwave irradiation caused central nervous system changes and affected behaviour even at low intensity. Physiological disturbances include immune suppression, hormonal imbalances, sleep impairment and sterility.(108)
    The new British police radio system called TETRA, uses pulsed microwaves at 17.6Hz, a frequency in the 13Hz to 20Hz beta range of the human brain’s electrical activity. Unlike ordinary mobile phone masts which only respond on demand and produce a continuous microwave signal, TETRA masts are permanently active. TETRA is a £3 billion system initiated by the Home Office that will be adopted by all British police forces by the end of 2005.(109)
     Interference with the alpha wave of brain activity is threatened by the U.S. Defense Dept.’s High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP), a gigantic electromagnetic frequency generator in Alaska:


     The alpha-wave frequency of the human brain is known to be between eight and twelve hertz… The ionospheric wave-guide oscillates at eight hertz, making it a good harmonic carrier of low frequency sound (LFS) waves. In the June 17 1976 issue of New Scientist, Dr Frank Barnaby, Director of the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, warned that if methods could be devised to produce greater field strengths of such low-frequency oscillations, either by natural or artificial means, then it might become possible to impair performance of a large group of people in selected regions over extended periods.(110)


    There are equivalent projects elsewhere in the world – European Incoherent Scatter Radar site (EISCAT) in Tromsoe, Norway and SURA in Nizhny Novgorod, Russia.


14.8 JUNK FOOD  


     The Western diet is a ‘slow kill’ which largely goes undetected. Three major components – sugar, caffeine, and hydrogenated vegetable oils- open the door for every type of disease by playing havoc with the body’s metabolism and immune system. On top of this are the neuro-toxic and cancer causing flavour enhancers which are added to the majority of processed foods and soft drinks especially in the U.S.. A report, Adolescent Health, published by the British Medical Association, in December 2003 stated that the present generation of children and teenagers will turn into the most obese and infertile adults in the history of mankind.(111)




     Refined sugar is extremely immune suppressing and is the first item that should be cut out of the diet of anyone suffering from chronic illness or wanting to avoid it. A suppressed immune system opens the door to every serious disease including cancer. Caffeine exacerbates this effect. (112)




     For decades the public health authorities persuaded the public that animal fats were bad and that they should consume healthier poly-unsaturated fats found in vegetable oils. The current hysteria regarding cholesterol stems from research done during the 1940s and 1950s by the manufacturers of the new margarines and ‘healthy’ fats made with hydrogenated vegetable oils. The suggestion was that cholesterol (specifically LDL-cholesterol) was responsible for heart disease, which was even then beginning to increase, due to the relatively high-fat diet enjoyed by most westerners. This is not borne out by the facts. Western diets had always contained a relatively high proportion of red meat. In 1978, Dr. Mary Enig also proved that cancer rates were directly related to consumption of vegetable oils (including hydrogenated vegetable oils) and total fat intake, but not related to animal fat consumption. This research is often ignored by the cholesterol lobby, despite the fact that it has been confirmed by other researchers. When food manufacturers heat vegetable oil at very high temperatures 250- 400 C and usually in the presence of catalysts, they undergo hydrogenation which turns them into saturated fats. The melting point of the oil is raised, turning many previously liquid oils into solids. Shelf-life is increased, as the resulting oil is less susceptible to degrading over time. All nutritional value in the original oil is lost. The texture of the resultant solid can be made to resemble that of natural animal fats. However, during this process, ‘trans-fats’ are formed which are found to cause significant increases in blood cholesterol. Most processed foods in supermarkets that contain fat will therefore be laden with these potentially lethal trans-fats. (113)
    Ischaemic heart disease (IHD) was virtually unknown until the 1940s, when hydrogenated vegetable oils were introduced. Now it is one of the biggest killer in the Western world. The dangers of trans-fats were recognized as long ago as 1958, but the vegetable oil industry continues to bad-mouth safer natural animal fats.
     Announced on the front page of The Daily Mail on 5 July 2003, threats of legal action have caused major multi-national food companies including Cadbury, Kellogg, Nestle and United Biscuits to reduce or eliminate hydrogenated vegetable oils from their products. Fearing litigation like that taken against cigarette companies, the food companies decided to take drastic action.
    On 11th March 2003, Denmark passed a law banning all but the tiniest amount of trans-fat from food. (114) On 12th January 2005, the U.S. Government issued guidelines to manufacturers and consumers to reduce trans-fat intake and has forthcoming legislation on mandatory labeling. (115)




     There are a growing number of clinicians and scientists who are convinced that a group of compounds called excitotoxins play a critical role in the development of several neurological disorders. , Excitotoxins: The Taste That Kills, by neuro-surgeon Dr. Russell Blaylock, describes how the common flavour enhancers monosodium glutamate, hydrolyzed vegetable protein, and Aspartame/Nutrasweet are extremely neuro-toxic. They literally put holes in the brain, and cause neurological diseases and cancer, as proven in an enormous body of scientific research. Brain tumours grow rapidly in the presence of the concentration of glutamic acid. Fully aware of these facts, the public health regulators have allowed hundreds of millions of people to consume excitotoxins for over fifty years.
     The sweetener Aspartame would never have been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in 1981 without lobbying by G.D. Searle Inc.( since bought out by Monsanto) headed by Donald Rumsfeld. The FDA regulators who approved Aspartame went on to take jobs in the multi-billion dollar Aspartame industry. In addition to the FDA Commissioner who left to take up a job with G.D. Searle, four other FDA officials connected with the approval of Aspartame took positions connected with the Aspartame industry between 1979 and 1982: The Deputy FDA Commissioner, the Special Assistant to the FDA Commissioner, the Associate Director of the Bureau of Foods and Toxicology, and the Attorney involved with the Public Board of Inquiry. (116)
    The Food and Drug Administration once listed 92 adverse reactions from 10,000 consumer complaints and would send the list to all inquirers. In 1996 the FDA stopped taking complaints and now denies existence of the report.
    In September 2004, a $350 million class action lawsuit was filed against Monsanto. The suit charges the defendants with manufacturing and marketing a deadly neurotoxin unfit for human consumption, while they assured the pubic that aspartame products are safe and healthful, even for children and pregnant women. Donald Rumsfeld is mentioned throughout the lawsuit. (117)
     Worse still, regulations allow food manufacturers to label their foods ‘contains no flavour enhancers’ if the MSG content is less than 99% pure. MSG can be described as anything the food companies like such as ‘spice extracts’ or ‘natural flavourings’.(118) (119) Most savoury processed foods purchased in supermarkets contain either MSG or hydrolyzed vegetable protein.




    In 1924 soybean production in the U.S. was only at 1.8 million acres harvested. Today, the soybean is America’s third largest crop (harvesting 72 million acres in 1998), supplying more than 50 percent of the world’s soybean demand.
     Most of these beans are made into animal feed and are manufactured into soy oil for use as vegetable oil, margarine and shortening. For more than 20 years now, the soy industry has concentrated on finding alternative uses and new markets for soybeans and soy byproducts. It can now be found disguised as everything from soy cheese, milk, burgers and hot dogs, to ice cream, yogurt, vegetable oil, baby formula and flour. These are often marketed as low-fat, dairy-free, or as a high-protein, meat substitute for vegetarians. But soy isn’t always mentioned on food labels. Today, 60% of the food on America’s supermarket shelves contain soy derivatives (i.e. soy flour, textured vegetable protein, partially hydrogenated soy bean oil, soy protein isolate). (120)
    All soybean producers pay a mandatory assessment of one-half to one per cent of the net market price of soybeans. The total – something like US$80 million annually – supports United Soybean’s programme to strengthen the position of soybeans in the marketplace. Public relations firms help convert research projects into newspaper articles and advertising copy, and law firms lobby for favourable government regulations. IMF money funds soy processing plants in foreign countries, and free trade policies keep soybean abundance flowing to overseas destinations. The push for more soy consumption has been relentless and global in its reach. (121)
    On 25th October 1999, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) decided to allow a health claim for products “low in saturated fat and cholesterol” that contain 6.25 grams of soy protein per serving. The best marketing strategy for a product that is inherently unhealthy is, of course, a health claim.
    Two senior U.S. government scientists, Drs. Daniel Doerge and Daniel Sheehan of the National Center for Toxicological Research, broke ranks with the FDA, claiming that soy could increase the risk of breast cancer in women, cause brain damage and thyroid disorders, and cause sexual abnormalities in infants. They wrote an internal protest letter warning of 28 studies revealing toxic effects of soy, mostly focusing on chemicals in soy known as isoflavones, which have effects similar to the female hormone oestrogen. (122)They pointed to a major study of 3,734 Japanese American men which found that soy consumption was associated with increased brain shrinkage in middle age, increased cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease. (123) Soy has the highest level of glutamic acid of any plant food, therefore it has an excitotoxic effect on the brain. (124)
  In May 2003, the U.K. Government’s Committee on Toxicity of Chemicals in Food, Consumer Products and the Environment issued a report on phytoestrogens and health. It concluded,


    After reviewing the data and conclusions in the report relating to soy-based infant formula, SACN considered that there is cause for concern about the use of soy-based infant formula. Additionally, there is neither substantive medical need for, nor health benefit arising from, the use soy-based infant formulae (125)


   The Committee also noted that, exposure to oestrogen in infants can lead to menstrual problems in females and low sperm count in males. “The amount of phytoestrogens that are in a day’s worth of soy infant formula equals 5 birth control pills,” says Mary G. Enig, Ph.D., president of the Maryland Nutritionists Association. She and other nutrition experts believe that infant exposure to high amounts of phytoestrogens is associated with early puberty in girls and retarded physical maturation in boys. A study published in The Lancet in July 1997, by Dr K. Setchell et al. found that in the blood of infants tested, concentrations of soy isoflavones were 13000-22000 times higher than natural estrogen concentrations in early life. (126)
      A study of babies born to vegetarian mothers, published in the British Journal of Urology in January 2000, indicated just what those changes in baby’s development might be. Mothers who ate a vegetarian diet during pregnancy had a fivefold greater risk of delivering a boy with hypospadias, a birth defect of the penis. The authors of the study suggested that the cause was greater exposure to phytoestrogens in soy foods popular with vegetarians. (127)
    Early maturation in girls is frequently a harbinger for problems with the reproductive system later in life, including failure to menstruate, infertility and breast cancer. (128)
    In short, soy is certainly nature’s contraceptive and may also be affecting the sexual characteristics and sexual orientation of future generations. It is recognized that transexuality is a medical condition caused by the effect of hormonal aberrations on the brain of the developing foetus.(129) On 20 January 2005, the U.K. Civil Service website on Diversity reported that,


         Estimates vary on the number of transvestite men in the population, owing to the lack of any research data whatsoever. Informed guesses have been as high as 1 in 20 adult males. Certainly estimates between 1/100 and 1/200 would not be outrageous, if judged only by the commercial success of businesses catering for the interests of those people.  


    …. Depending where you draw the line in what to count, between 1 in 200 and 1 in 1000 children are born with a visible or concealed ambiguity in their genitals, gonads and/or chromosomes which qualify them as Intersex (130)


    Soy is not the only substance linked to sexual changes in humans. The National Geographic magazine reported that scientists are warning that chemicals in pesticides, plastics and other products are ‘endocrine disrupters’ which are having a serious gender altering impact on both animals and humans. (131)




Relevant articles >> 1, 2



    Water fluoridation has been rejected by most Western European nations but the U.K. currently fluoridates 11% of its water supply and the U.S around 60%. The 2003 Water Act requires British water companies to fluoridate the water supply if requested to do so by the local Strategic Health Authorities. However any decision by health authorities must follow public consultation at the local level. (132) (133)
     A by-product of the nuclear power, fertilizer, and other heavy industries, fluoride is more toxic than lead and only marginally less toxic than arsenic.
   Dr. R. Swinburne Clymer tried to expose the purpose of water fluoridation in his book, The Age of Treason (1957). He wrote:


    Charles Eliot Perkins, a research worker in chemistry, biochemistry, physiology and pathology . . . was sent by the United States Government to help take charge of the I.G. Farben chemical plants in Germany at the end of the second world war. What follows are statements from a letter which Mr. Perkins wrote the Lee Foundation for Nutritional Research. . . .
    ‘. . . In the 1930s Hitler and the German Nazis envisioned a world to be dominated and controlled by the Nazi philosophy of pan-Germanism. . . .


    The German chemists worked out a very ingenious and far-reaching plan of mass control which was submitted to and adopted by the German General Staff. This plan was to control the population in any given area through mass medication of drinking water supplies. By this method they could control the population of whole areas, reduce population by water medication that would produce sterility in the women, and so on. In this scheme of mass control, sodium fluoride occupied a prominent place.


    We are told by the ideologists who are advocating the fluoridation of water supplies in this country that their purpose is to reduce the incidence of tooth decay in children . . . the real reason behind fluorination is not to benefit children’s teeth. The real purpose behind water fluorination is to reduce the resistance of the masses to domination and control and loss of liberty.


. . . there is a small area of brain tissue that is responsible for the individual’s power to resist domination. Repeated doses of infinitesimal amounts of fluorine will in time gradually reduce the individual’s power to resist domination by slowly poisoning and narcotizing this area of brain tissue and make him submissive to the will of those who wish to govern him. . . .


. . . any person who drinks artificially fluorinated water for a period of one year or more will never again be the same person, mentally or physically. (134)


    On 29th June 2000, Dr William J. Hirzy testified before the U.S. Senate Subcommittee on Wildlife, Fisheries and Drinking Water.(135) He represented the labour union of the professional toxicologists, biologists, chemists, engineers and lawyers working at the headquarters of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The union voted to oppose water fluoridation in 1997.


    These are some of the points Dr Hirzy made to the committee:


–  According to a study by the National Institute of Dental Research, 66 percent of American children in fluoridated communities show the visible sign of over-exposure and fluoride toxicity, dental fluorosis.


– In 1998, the results of a fifty-year fluoridation experiment involving Kingston, New York (un-fluoridated) and Newburg, New York (fluoridated) were published. In summary, there is no overall significant difference in rates of dental decay in children in the two cities, but children in the fluoridated city show significantly higher rates of dental fluorosis than children in the un-fluoridated city.


-There is epidemiological evidence showing elevated bone cancer in young men related to consumption of fluoridated drinking water.


– In 1990, the results of the National Toxicology Program cancer bioassay on sodium fluoride were published, the initial findings of which would have ended fluoridation. But a special commission was hastily convened to review the findings, resulting in the salvation of fluoridation through systematic down-grading of the evidence of carcinogenicity. The final, published version of the NTP report says that there is, “equivocal evidence of carcinogenicity in male rats,” changed from “clear evidence of carcinogenicity in male rats.” The change prompted Dr. William Marcus, who was then Senior Science Adviser and Toxicologist in the Office of Drinking Water, to blow the whistle about the issue, which led to his firing by EPA. Dr. Marcus sued EPA, won his case and was reinstated with back pay, benefits and compensatory damages.


– Since 1994 there have been six publications that link fluoride exposure to direct adverse effects on the brain. Two epidemiology studies from China indicate depression of I.Q. in children. A 1998 paper shows brain and kidney damage in animals given the “optimal” dosage of fluoride, viz. one part per million. Another publication links fluoride dosing to adverse effects on the brains pineal gland and pre-mature onset of sexual maturity in animals


– In three landmark cases adjudicated since 1978 in Pennsylvania, Illinois and Texas, judges with no interest except finding fact and administering justice, heard prolonged testimony from proponents and opponents of fluoridation. None of them could find evidence supporting fluoridation but all were convinced of its toxicity. Judge Anthony Farris in Texas found: “[That] the artificial fluoridation of public water supplies, such as contemplated by {Houston} City ordinance No. 80-2530 may cause or contribute to the cause of cancer, genetic damage, intolerant reactions, and chronic toxicity, including dental mottling, in man; that the said artificial fluoridation may aggravate malnutrition and existing illness in man; and that the value of said artificial fluoridation is in some doubt as to reduction of tooth decay in man


– In recent years, two prominent dental researchers who were leaders of the pro-fluoridation movement announced reversals of their former positions because they concluded that water fluoridation is not an effective means of reducing dental caries and that it poses serious risks to human health. The late Dr. John Colquhoun was Principal Dental Officer of Aukland, New Zealand, and he published his reasons for changing sides in 1997. In 1999, Dr. Hardy Limeback, Head of Preventive Dentistry, University of Toronto, announced his change of views, then published a statement dated April 2000.


    The scienfic literature is full of studies that support Dr Hirzy’s testimony. Animal studies show decreased fertility and higher rates of miscarriage in animals that drank fluoridated water. Fluoridation leads to osteoporosis and increased fractures. Regions with high levels of fluoride in the drinking water have 220% more fractures. Fluoride accumulates in the thyroid gland and produces hypothyroidism. Communities with fluoridated water have higher rates of cancer than non-fluoridated communities. The incidence of osteogenic sarcoma in males is 70% higher in fluoridated regions. Phyllis Mullenix showed the disastrous effect of water fluoridation on the brains of unborn and newborn animals, and numerous studies show a reduction of I.Q. in humans. Fluoride is the active ingredient in Prozac, Paxil, and several other widely used psychotrophic medications. (136)
    The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has never approved any fluoride product for the purpose of preventing tooth decay.(137)




Relevant articles >> 1, 2





          In the event that I am reincarnated, I would like to return as a deadly virus, in order to contribute something to solve overpopulation – HRH Prince Philip, reported by Deutsche Press Agentur (DPA), August, 1988.


     By 2020 UNAIDS estimates seventy million people will have died from AIDS.(138)There is scientific controversy over what causes AIDS. Not all researchers agree that the HIV virus causes AIDS. Some believe that AIDS is caused by the toxic drugs such as AZT used to treat the infection or is a cumulative result of malnutrition and other environmental and lifestyle factors.
     However, it wasn’t long after AIDS appeared in the early 1980s that rumours of its man-made origins began to circulate. Most doctors will dismiss this as lunacy, but both The National Institutes of Health and Rockefellers’ Exxon Mobil subscribe to a publication dedicated to the idea – The Journal of Degenerative Diseases. I have subscribed to the journal since 2001, and am member of the Common Cause Medical Foundation which publishes it. The Foundation was set up by a retired Canadian professor named Donald Scott. He began researching chronic fatigue syndrome(CFS)/ Myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME), but over a number of years he came to the conclusion a whole range of chronic diseases had a common cause, and that this was most likely a biological warfare agent developed by the U.S. military.
      Much of the groundwork had already been prepared, not least by the book Emerging Viruses: AIDS and Ebola, published in 1996. Harvard Public Health graduate and practicing dentist, Dr. Leonard Horowitz documented how AIDS was manufactured in the laboratories of American universities and U.S. military biological warfare contractors during the 1960s and 70s. The programme was secret until 1972, when it was publicly named the ‘War on Cancer’.
     Dr. Horowitz’s research confirmed the ideas of Californian pharmacologist, Dr. Robert Strecker. In his film produced in the late ’80s, The Strecker Memorandum, Dr. Strecker states that HIV is genomically very similar to the visna virus of sheep and the bovine leukemia virus of cattle, and that this hybrid could have been created in the laboratory. The documentation discovered by Horowitz showed that the National Cancer Institute’s Special Virus Cancer Program 1964-1978, (called Special Virus Leukemia Program until 1968), involved recombining animal immuno-deficiency viruses and cancer viruses. Self proclaimed co-discoverer of HIV, Dr. Bob Gallo, was a senior SVCP scientist.
     Most of the SVCP reports were shredded during the Watergate scandal but many surviving copies of the 15 annual progress reports have been retrieved. Horowitz concluded that HIV was introduced to gay males in the U.S. and into blacks in Africa in the late ’70s through experimental vaccine programmes, in particular the hepatitis B vaccine developed by Merck Sharpe & Dohm Inc..
     Emerging Viruses contains an endorsement from Dr. Garth Nicolson, one of the world’s leading microbiologists and researchers on Gulf War Illness and former consultant to the U.S. Defense Dept:


    One cannot fail to grasp the explosive significance of this book and its main thesis, that biological weapons programs developed and field tested immune-system-destroying agents that now cannot be contained.


    Dr. John Martin, a former Food and Drug Administration insider and expert on the cover-up of animal virus contamination of human polio vaccines wrote the foreword to the book.
     However, Emerging Viruses did not address the key question posed by the AIDS dissidents such as Dr. Peter Duesberg: Does HIV really cause AIDS? Donald Scott’s research into the symptoms of CFS, AIDS and other neuro-systemic diseases suggests that they are consistent with chronic mycoplasma infection, a strain of tiny bacteria. Until quite recently, most doctors hadn’t even heard of mycoplasma even though it is documented in the scientific literature going back a hundred years. Mycoplasma fermentans was identified by I.G. Farben during WWII and was one of the biological agents tested on prisoners in the concentration camps.
    Unlike viruses and conventional bacteria, mycoplasma are dependent on the uptake of pre-formed sterols from host cells. This means they can feed off the vital hormones produced by the endocrine glands. On page 39 of SVCP report no. 9,1972, the project leaders state that, in order to ‘activate’ retro-viruses (HIV is one), it was first necessary to suppress the immune system by, ‘physiological alteration of the endocrine balance’. Certain pesticides and chemicals were also noted to have this effect, which does lend support to the AIDS dissidents belief that toxic drugs can cause AIDS. Furthermore, on page 287, it is revealed that the National Institutes for Health contract with Dr. Leonard Hayfick of Stanford University to procure and study mycoplasmas was initiated in 1964, when SVCP began.  
      World expert on mycoplasma, Dr. Garth Nicolson agrees that they cause immune suppression and therefore enhance the pathogenesis of HIV:


          Pathogenic Mycoplasma species may influence HIV pathogenesis by specific and direct activation or suppression of the immune system.(139) 


     Dr. Nicolson’s professional expertise in Polymerase Chain Reaction testing also brought him to the conclusion that similarities between the surface components of both organisms enables mycoplasma fermentans to bind to HIV. He was roundly attacked by scientific colleagues when he suggested that the HIV -1 envelope gene had been inserted into certain mycoplasmas in the laboratory:


     Mycoplasmas possessing the HIV-1 env gene could allegedly have been engineered to make them more invasive and pathogenic and more difficult to find. The HIV-1 env gene encodes a surface glycoprotein, gp120, that is involved in virus attachment and entry into cells through receptors on the cell surface. This could result in opportunistic cell attachment and penetration of many types of cells and most tissues.(140)


     The possibility that mycoplasma and HIV work together as a ‘binary’ biological weapon is indicated by the existence of a U.S. Army patent on mycoplasma fermentans incognitus strain, filed by Dr. Shyh-Ching Lo in 1991. Patent no. 5,242,820 gives the American Registry of Pathology proprietary rights over methods of detecting the organism and development of vaccines for it.(141)The patent gives some important background information on the question of whether or not HIV causes AIDS. Dr. Lo states: ‘the human retroviruses have not fulfilled Koch’s postulates, ie. producing transmissible AIDS-like diseases in experimental animals’. When the researchers infected human t-cells with HIV in the test tube, they eventually recovered from the initial cytocidal effects and remained persistently infected. However when M. fermentans incognitus was added, the cells died. Outside of the laboratory, the army researchers reported that 26 out of 32 patients (81.25%) with HIV and showing symptoms of AIDS were infected with M. fermentans incognitus.(142) Dr. Lo concluded that this organism was indeed a very likely co-factor in the progression of AIDS.


     The patent also states:


     Some of these patients who are infected with M. fermentans incognitus will be patients who have been diagnosed as having AIDS or ARC, chronic fatigue syndrome, Wegener’s diseases, sarcoidosis, respiratory distress syndrome, Kibuchi’s disease, autoimmune diseases such as as collagen vascular disease and Lupus and chronic debilitating diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease.


     Dr. Nicolson’s research on mycoplasma has also confirmed the significance of a mycoplasma in a wide range of neuro-systemic degenerative diseases. 100% of Gulf War Illness patients who developed amyotrophic lateral sclerosis tested positive for mycoplasma infection. 7 out of 8 were positive for mycoplasma fermentans strain.(143) Overall  ~40% of veterans with Gulf War Illness were infected with mycoplasma fermentans.(144) He also found mycoplasma infection in 50% of North American patients with rheumatoid arthritis; in 51% of North American patients with CFS; and in 69% of European patients with CFS.(145)(146)
    The co-discoverer of HIV, Dr. Luc Montagnier, warns that AIDS research should not neglect the role of cofactors. In particular he emphasizes the need to research the mycoplasma as a virulence factor of HIV:


     [i]t is a deplorable fact that to this day, the number of researchers interested in this line of investigation worldwide barely exceeds the number of fingers on both hands.(147)


     The reason why official public health policy has ignored the role of the mycoplasma and focused on HIV is because mycoplasma is a type of bacteria and therefore can be treated successfully with long-term administration of inexpensive antibiotics such as doxycycline. The U.S. Army patent reads:


     M. fermentans incognitus is known to be sensitive to a number of antibiotics, including doxycycline, quinalones such as ciprofloxacin, chloramphenicol and tetracycline. Therefore, effective treatment of any of the above implicated diseases should include administration of antibiotics to which M. fermentans incognitus is sensitive.


      This is this is not a popular idea with the multi-billion dollar AZT industry. PCR testing for mycoplasma is not offered by the U.K.’s National Health Service, or indeed any public health service in the world. Only a handful of specialist research laboratories offer these tests. Dr. Nicolson’s work on testing and treating Gulf War Illness victims for mycoplasma infection has been rejected and even sabotaged by the U.S. Defense Dept.(148)Treatment for AIDS is being denied because mainstream medical research is controlled by the elite. On 30th April 2000, the Washington Post reported that the U.S. National Security Council had declared AIDS a threat to national security and therefore would be involved with directing AIDS research, the first time it had ever been involved in fighting an infectious disease.(149) Dr. Horowitz commented:


    According to U.S. government watchdog groups, and related policy analysts linked to JuriMed — a North American alternative medicine advocacy organization — the new Clinton decree empowers the CIA to act against scientific “dissidents” who raise concerns regarding vaccination policies, as done in this article, as a threat to U.S. national security. The JuriMed communique heralded the likelihood of increased “mainstream [media] blackouts on AIDS dissident positions,” and “global disease control” initiatives including “wide-ranging vaccination programs” becoming more coercive. (150)




     1) Emerging Viruses: AIDS and Ebola – Nature, Accident or Intentional ? by Dr. Leonard Horowitz DMD, MA, MPH; Tetrahedron Publishing Group,1996. See
     2) The Journal of Degenerative Diseases, especially 2002 Vol 3, no’s 3&4 and 2003 Vol 4 no’s 2&3. Write to The Common Cause Medical Research Foundation, Box 133 Stn B, Sudbury ON, P3E 4N5, Canada; or contact me if you live in UK.
     3) Key Documents available from The Common Cause Medical Research Foundation
     i) Department of Defense Appropriations for 1970. Hearings before a Subcommittee of the Committee on Appropriations, House of Representatives Ninety-first Congress, First Session, 9 June 1969. Download them here >>
 [ Download selected pages :
page 1

page 2

page 3


page 4



     This single most important document on AIDS was obtained under Freedom of Information Act by Ted Strecker (Dr Robert Strecker’s brother) and Congressman Douglas Huff of Chicago. Both men died mysteriously shortly afterwards in August and September 1988 respectively.(151) Page 129 of the Hearings records the most significant statements on AIDS ever made. Dr. Donald MacArthur, Deputy Director of Research and Technology, Department of Defense Research and Engineering told the Congressmen that,


     Molecular biology is a field that is advancing very rapidly, and eminent biologists believe that within a period of 5 to 10 years it would be possible to produce a synthetic biological agent, an agent that does not naturally exist and for which no natural immunity could have been acquired… it would probably be possible to make a new infective microorganism which could differ in certain important aspects from any known disease-causing organisms. Most important of these is that it might be refractory to the immunological and therapeutic processes upon which we depend to maintain our relative freedom from infectious disease… A research program to explore the feasibility of this could be completed in approximately 5 years at a total cost of $10 million… It is a highly controversial issue, and there are many who believe such research should not be undertaken lest it lead to yet another method of massive killing of large populations.


     This is a functional description of AIDS which is currently killing 8000 people a day.
ii) Smallpox Vaccine “triggered Aids Virus“, by Pierce Wright, Science Editor, The Times, London, front page, 11th May 1987.[Download scanned copy here. 1.4MB].Unnamed insiders from the World Health Organization told The Times that they believed the thirteen year long smallpox eradication program in Africa awakened the dormant HIV virus. The programme concluded in 1978, the same year the Special Virus Cancer Programme ended and the first AIDS cases appeared:


  The spread of HIV infection coincides with the most intense immunization programmes… Brazil, the only South American country covered in the eradication campaign, has the highest incidence of Aids in that region. About 14,000 Haitians on United Nations secondment to Central Africa, were covered in the campaign. They began to return home at a time when Haiti had become a playground for San Francisco Homosexuals.


     This story was never mentioned again by The Times or any other mainstream media outlet, indicative of frantic censorship. All attempts to get mainstream media attention to the man-made theory of AIDS are blocked. Journalists from mainstream news organizations have approached Donald Scott but the story never gets past the editor. The New York Times refused to review Dr. Horowitz’s book Emerging Viruses.
     iii) United States Patent 5,242,820, Pathogenic mycoplasma, Lo, 7 Sept. 1993 (also available on-line at U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
     iv) Special Virus Cancer Program Progress Reports of The National Cancer Institute: 1971 (8), 1972 (9), 1976 (13) and 1978 (15). These are referenced in Emerging Viruses and in The Journal of Degenerative Diseases but the complete documents are available from the Common Cause Medical Research Foundation.
     v) The Scientific Paper Trail, by Don Scott. A collection of important papers from peer-reviewed journals such as JAMA and The New England Journal of Medicine. Many are referenced in The Journal of Degenerative Diseases.




     Whilst AIDS is depopulating the Third World, the West is being plagued by a multitude of disabling diseases. As stated in Chapter 7, disease is an important tool for maintaining the social hierarchy by two methods: firstly, by making people dependent upon the petrochemical cartel for treatment, and secondly, by reducing living standards. Certain disabling diseases, in which mycoplasma infection plays a significant role, appeared in the West at the same time as AIDS. These include CFS or Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (M.E.), fibromyalgia and Lyme disease.
     Even based on the public health authorities’ very conservative estimate of 0.4% prevalence, CFS/ME has disabled over a million Americans and 250,000 British. The true figures are possibly double these. No specific pharmaceutical treatment is being developed and there has been a coordinated effort by the health authorities in the West to deny this disease even exists and then to label it a psychiatric disorder despite the overwhelming evidence of an infectious origin. The current U.K. Science Minister, Lord Sainsbury, the supermarket baron, and Cambridge psychology graduate uses his family’s Linbury Trust to fund purely psychiatric research into both CFS/ME and Gulf War Illness. Many independent researchers have come up with inexpensive, proven, and effective treatment regimes but the health authorities refuse to recognize them.
     The cover-up was documented in Osler’s Web, a book written in 1996 by Hillary Johnson, a former Wall Street Journal writer and Life staff reporter. Ms Johnson has since disappeared and the publishers are now ‘no longer allowed ‘ to print this book.(152)
    The same public health policy is being applied to Lyme disease which is very similar to CFS/ME. Even though it is recognized as being an infectious disease, the authorities are blocking doctors from using inexpensive long term antibiotic treatment which is proven to be effective.
     The lack of treatment of veterans of the first Gulf War is also inexplicable. The American Gulf War Veterans Association estimates 300,000 of the 700,000 troops serving at the time of the Gulf War conflict are sick as a result of their military duty, a prevalence of 42%.(153) The Defense Dept. is refusing to acknowledge that there is a Gulf War Illness, labelling victims as suffering from “post-traumatic stress disorder” even though studies indicate 40% are infected with mycoplasma fermentans and would therefore benefit from antimicrobial therapy.(154)
     A CIA press release entitled Darker Bioweapons Future confirmed the viability of biological agents for economic warfare. It reports that a panel of experts from the National Academy of Sciences studying the future threat of biological weapons believed that a genetically engineered stealth virus could be used to cripple a large number of people in their forties and fifties with severe arthritis, concealing its hostile origin and leaving a country with massive health and economic problems. It also warned that, ‘the effects of these engineered biological agents could be worse than any disease known to man’ and that advances in biotechnology will be very hard to police.(155)




     Rebuilding America’s Defenses, written in September 2000 by the neo-conservative think tank, Project for the New American Century (PNAC) hints that the U.S. may consider developing biological weapons “that can target specific genotypes [and] may transform biological warfare from the realm of terror to a politically useful tool “(156)




   Depleted Uranium is a serious health hazard when DU munitions are fired and burn up on impact. Radioactive dust blows around in the air, enabling the DU to get into the body through the lungs and broken skin.
    On behalf of the U.S. Army, Major Doug Rokke led a 434 man depleted uranium clean up team in the first Gulf War. The entire team became sick from DU exposure almost as soon as they arrived in the Gulf. In 1994, he was appointed as depleted uranium project director for the U.S. Army. Despite his warnings of the dangers of DU exposure, both the U.S. army and coalition forces continue to use DU munitions with catastrophic effects on both their own troops and civilian populations.
    The table below shows statistics of permanent disability claims for U.S. troops according to the Government’s Veterans Administration.(157)


Gulf War I
Number of surviving troops from the combat phase of Gulf War I
Number of permanent disability claims submitted by May 2004                                  
Number of permanent disability claims awarded by the VA by May 2004  




Gulf War II (Operation Iraqi Freedom)
Number of permanent disability claims awarded by the VA by August 2004       




Troops serving in the Gulf Region between August 1990 and May 2004
Number of permanent disability claims awarded by the VA by May 2004                             





    Dr Rokke and many other researchers believe that the hundreds of tonnes of DU dust deposited in Iraq, Afghanistan and the former Yugoslavia, are responsible for an epidemic of cancers, birth defects and an array of neuro-systemic degenerative diseases in both Allied troops and native populations.This is, in fact, a covert form of nuclear warfare, the effects of which may never properly be known.(158)




     As described in Chapter 4, thirty million women a year are forced to undergo abortion or sterilization in China. Leading Chinese dissident and Executive Director of Laogai Research Foundation Harry Wu states that the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) cooperates closely with the Chinese government in implementing the one child policy. An independent Population Research Investigation studied a UNFPA so-called ‘model county’ programme in China between 27-30 Sept. 2001. It found that ‘voluntary’ family planning in the Sihui County UNFPA programme did not exist. The team was told by Chinese Family Planning officials that there was no distinction between UNFPA’s work in this county and their own. Chinese officials showed PRI investigators the UNFPA office desk, which was located within the local Chinese Family Planning Office.(159)
     Norplant is an implant which prevents pregnancy for at least five years. It can only be removed by surgery. The patent is held by the Rockefeller funded Population Council. The BBC documentary, Horizon: The Human Laboratory showed how these implants are not easily removed, and in many cases the doctors refuse to take them out even if they are causing severe side effects. Despite this, it is being tested on tens of thousands of women around the world. (160)


14.13 GM FOOD 


     The Ecologist magazine reported that adopting GM crops would place farmers and the food chain itself under the control of a handful of multinational corporations such as Monsanto, Syngenta, Bayer, and DuPont. For U.S. farmers this has meant:


     1. Legally-binding agreements that force farmers to purchase expensive new seeds from the biotech corporations each season;


     2. Having to buy these corporations’ herbicides (at a cost considerably above that of a generic equivalent) for herbicide-tolerant crops;


     3. Paying the biotech firms a technology fee based on the acreage of land under GM;


     4. The development of so-called `traitor technology’ crops on which particular chemicals will have to be applied if the crops’ GM characteristics (such as their time of flowering or disease resistance) are to show;


     5. The invention of `terminator technology’ that stops GM plants producing fertile seeds; thus farmers are physically prevented from sowing saved seed and have to buy new seed from the biotech firms instead; and


     6. Biotech firms buying up seed companies. This creates monopolies and limits farmers’ choices still further. DuPont and Monsanto are now the two largest seed companies in the world. As a result of their control of the seed industry, farmers are reporting that the availability of good non-GM seed varieties is rapidly disappearing.


     According to the UK Soil Association: ‘ All non-GM farmers in North America are finding it very hard or impossible to grow GM-free crops. Seeds have become almost completely contaminated with GM organisms (GMOs), good non-GM varieties have become hard to buy, and there is a high risk of crop contamination.’ The U.K. Government’s official adviser on GM, the Agriculture and Environment Biotechnology Commission (AEBC), has said it would `be difficult and in some places impossible to guarantee’ that any British food was GM-free if commercial growing of GM crops went ahead. In North America, farmers can no longer be certain the seed they plant does not contain GM genes. (161)
     GM food scientists can increase the vitamin content of food, so there is no reason why they cannot reduce it in order to increase malnutrition, disease, and death on a large scale. For example, more than $100 million has been spent over 10 years to produce transgenic rice at the Institute of Plant Sciences in Zurich. The Zurich team introduced three genes taken from daffodils and bacteria into a rice strain to produce a yellow rice with high levels of beta-carotene, which is converted to Vitamin A within the body. As well as altering vitamin content, over 300 open-field trials of `pharma’ crops have taken place around the world since 1991. In California, for example, GM rice containing human genes has been grown for drug production. Pharmaceutical wheat, corn, and barley are also being developed in the U.S., France and Canada. A biotech company called Prodigene has been working on growing edible vaccines in corn and in November 2000 began trials on an edible AIDS vaccine.(162)
    By introducing drugs into food, GM technology has huge population control potential.




Relevant articles >> 1, 2, 3



     Weather modification technology exists in America and Europe. The ability to deploy this technology for global depopulation without detection must be extremely tempting for the Malthusians since droughts, hurricanes, and floods can be blamed on natural weather variability, solar flares, and global warming. A study of future military strategy called Airforce 2025 was drawn up by the U.S. Air University in 1996.(163) In the section entitled Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025, the authors state that altering weather patterns will eventually become an “integral part of U.S. national security policy with both domestic and international applications”. By 2025 the Air Force fully expects to be able to influence the weather “on a mesoscale (<200 sq km) or microscale (immediate local area) to achieve operational capabilities.”…. “Achieving such a highly accurate and reasonably precise weather-modification capability in the next 30 years will require overcoming some challenging but not insurmountable technological and legal hurdles,” the report said.(164) “The lessons of history indicate a real weather-modification capability will eventually exist despite the risk (because) the drive exists. People have always wanted to control the weather and their desire will compel them to collectively and continuously pursue their goal,” the report concluded. The military also aim to deny an enemy satellite communication capabilities by modifying the Earth’s ionosphere.
     One of the stated objectives of the U.S. Defense Dept.’s High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP) is to, ‘simulate and control ionospheric processes that might alter the performance of communications and surveillance systems’.(165) The HAARP ionospheric Research Facility was established in Gakona, Alaska on 18th October 1993. HAARP can beam 3.6 Gigawatts of high frequency radio energy from earth based antennae into the ionosphere.(166) According to the HAARP website factsheet:


     Interest in the ionosphere is not limited to the US: a five-country consortium operates the European Incoherent Scatter Radar site (EISCAT), a premier world-class ionospheric research facility located in northern Norway near Tromsø. Facilities also are located at Jicamarca, Peru; near Moscow, Nizhny Novgorod (“SURA”) and Apatity, Russia; near Kharkov, Ukraine and in Dushanbe, Tadzhikistan.(167)


     Airforce 2025 does not specify HAARP as a weather modification device and it is not one of the HAARP’s official purposes. However the U.S. patent on HAARP’s technology states that it can serve as a giant ionospheric heater:


     In such experiments, certain regions of the ionosphere are heated to change the electron density and temperature within these regions. This is accomplished by transmitting from earth-based antennae high frequency electromagnetic radiation at a substantial angle to, not parallel to, the ionosphere’s magnetic field to heat the ionospheric particles primarily by ohmic heating. The electron temperature of the ionosphere has been raised by hundreds of degrees in these experiments, and electrons with several electron volts of energy have been produced in numbers sufficient to enhance airglow. (168) 


     The disclosure section of the patent adds:


     The production of enhanced ionization will also alter the distribution of atomic and molecular constituents of the atmosphere, most notably through increased atomic nitrogen concentration. The upper atmosphere is normally rich in atomic oxygen (the dominant atmospheric constituent above 200 km altitude), but atomic nitrogen is normally relatively rare. This can be expected to manifest itself in increased air glow, among other effects….This invention has a phenomenal variety of possible ramifications and potential future developments. As alluded to earlier, missile or aircraft destruction, deflection, or confusion could result, particularly when relativistic particles are employed. Also, large regions of the atmosphere could be lifted to an unexpectedly high altitude so that missiles encounter unexpected and unplanned drag forces with resultant destruction or deflection of same. Weather modification [emphasis added] is possible by, for example, altering upper atmosphere wind patterns or altering solar absorption patterns by constructing one or more plumes of atmospheric particles which will act as a lens or focusing device.


     HAARP is clearly one of the weather modification technologies known to the authors of 2025. The world’s foremost independent investigator of HAARP is the author of Angels Don’t Play this HAARP, Dr. Nick Begich from Alaska. He explains:


     HAARP zaps the ionosphere where it is relatively unstable. A point to remember is that the ionosphere is an active electrical shield protecting the planet from the constant bombardment of high-energy particles from space. This conducting plasma, along with Earth’s magnetic field, traps the electrical plasma of space and holds it back from going directly to the earth’s surface, says Charles Yost of Dynamic Systems, Leicester, North Carolina. “If the ionosphere is greatly disturbed, the atmosphere below is subsequently disturbed.(169)


     Dr. Begich also considers the role of weather modification as a weapon of mass destruction:


     In 1966, Professor Gordon J. F. MacDonald was associate director of the Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics at the University of California, Los Angeles, was a member of the President’s Science Advisory Committee, and later a member of the President’s Council on Environmental Quality. He published papers on the use of environmental-control technologies for military purposes. MacDonald made a revealing comment:”The key to geophysical warfare is the identification of environmental instabilities to which the addition of a small amount of energy would release vastly greater amounts of energy.” MacDonald had a number of ideas for using the environment as a weapon system and he contributed to what was, at the time, the dream of a futurist. When he wrote his chapter, “How To Wreck The Environment”, for the book Unless Peace Comes,he was not kidding around. In it he describes the use of weather manipulation, climate modification, polar ice cap melting or destabilization, ozone depletion techniques, earthquake engineering, ocean wave control and brain wave manipulation using the planet’s energy fields. He also said that these types of weapons would be developed and, when used, would be virtually undetectable by their victims. (170)


     It is worth noting that this book was written two years after The Report From Iron Mountain. This report identified environmental disaster as a credible substitute for war for the purpose of preserving social hierarchy, once world government had established permanent peace.
     In response to Dr. Nick Begich’s testimony to the European Parliament’s Foreign Affairs Subcommittee on Security and Disarmament 6th  February1998 in Brussels, Swedish MEP, Mrs. Maj Britt Theorin, put forward a motion for an independent international inquiry into HAARP a year later. The resolution describes HAARP as a weapons system which disrupts the climate and,


     …by virtue of its far-reaching impact on the environment to be a global concern and calls for its legal, ecological and ethical implications to be examined by an international independent body before any further research and testing; regrets the repeated refusal of the United States Administration to send anyone in person to give evidence to the public hearing or any subsequent meeting held by its competent committee into the environmental and public risks connected with the HAARP programme currently being funded in Alaska.(171)


     In October 2001, a similar bill was introduced to the U.S. Congress.  Dennis Kucinich, Democratic Congressman and former head of the Armed Services Oversight Committee, proposed to the 107th Congress, The Preservation of Space Act, HR2977. This called for a ban on space based weapons with specific reference to HAARP in section (c):


     The term `exotic weapons systems’ includes weapons designed to damage space or natural ecosystems (such as the ionosphere and upper atmosphere) or climate, weather, and tectonic systems with the purpose of inducing damage or destruction upon a target population or region on earth or in space. (172)


     In the same bill, Dennis Kucinich listed ‘chemtrails’ as one of the space based weapons to be banned. This is a high altitude aircraft spraying programme in the U.S. and Europe, observed with increasing frequency over the past two years. Unlike normal jet engine condensation trails – which form when hot engine exhaust momentarily condenses in the frigid stratosphere like exhaled breath on a cold day – chemical trails linger for hours, turning clear skies into milky haze in a process the U.S. Air Force calls “aerial obscuration”. What is being sprayed isn’t clear, only the milky streaks across the sky often forming grids, are evidence of the programme. The U.S. Airforce’s Boeing KC-135s appear to be the main source of chemtrails in North America.(173)The Hugbes Aircraft Company hold a patent on a mechanism for spraying the atmosphere with aluminium oxide via jet engine exhaust fumes.(174)  Some researchers believe that some of the metals being sprayed, especially barium, are designed to interact with the electromagnetic frequencies being generated by HAARP.
     Finally, in relation to possible martial law scenarios and the recent and bizarre power outages that affected 50 million Americans and Canadians in August 2003, and then hit London, Italy and Denmark a month later, HAARP’s website reads:


Ionospheric disturbances at high latitudes also can act to induce large currents in electric power grids; these are thought to cause power outages.(175)




     Hailed as the new industrial revolution, the ability to manipulate matter at the atomic level and create microscopic machines that can scour the human body is already well advanced.(176)The U.S. Government has allocated almost $700 million to military and civilian government departments for nanotechnology R and D. (177)There is obvious potential for introducing nanorobots into the bloodstream via routine vaccinations for undetected biological manipulation and genocide.




     The foundations for the genetic manipulation of humankind envisioned in Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World have already been laid.




     ‘Rebuilding Americas Defenses’ by the American think-tank PNAC states that race specific bioweapons could be a ‘politically useful tool.’ Furthermore the epidemiology of the global AIDS pandemic indicates that the population control agenda does have a bias against blacks. 70% of the world’s 42 million AIDS cases are in sub-Saharan Africa. Africa makes up only 14% of the world’s population. 40% of American AIDS victims are black; blacks make up only 13% of the American population.(178) 




     A cloned human embryo does not result from the random union of sperm and egg, but from a process called somatic cell nuclear transfer, in which the nucleus containing DNA from a cell of one individual is put into an egg whose nucleus has been removed. The resulting cloned embryo becomes virtually genetically identical to the individual whose DNA was inserted into the enucleated egg. (179) In October 2003 ITN news reported that at the University of Kentucky the first cloned human embryo was ready to be implanted into a surrogate mother for the purpose of cloning children.(180)




     Polls show that most people favour assisted suicide, believing in the right to die with dignity. However, other side of the coin is that the elite want the right to terminate us and to legalize euthanasia for this purpose. In December 1999, a senior consultant at a London hospital voiced concern that there was a policy of “involuntary euthanasia” by depriving elderly patients of food and water. (181) The British charity Age Concern states that there is a policy of not resuscitating seriously ill elderly patients. (182) The chilling expose of euthanasia in the U.S. Forced Exit by Wesley J. Smith, reveals how people entering hospital sign “living wills” allowing the hospital not to resuscitate them if they fall into a coma, only to find they are used by the hospital to deny patients treatment.(183) In the U.K. doctors can and do put ‘do not resuscitate’ on patients medical records without their consent.(184)




     Some of the work on the Human Genome Project is being done at The Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, NY. This was the old Station for Experimental Evolution and The Eugenics Records office and was endowed with funds from the Rockefellers and Harriman families in 1910. It was dedicated to scientific research of racial differences. Like the RIIA, the Bilderberg Group, The CFR and Trilateral Commission, The Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory host secret conferences. Its Banbury Center meetings are off -the-record discussions on molecular biology and genetics, human genetics, and science policy by the world’s leading scientists.(185)




     Alongside the physical science of genetic engineering emerged the social science of ‘bioethics’, the discipline which decides what is ethical medical practice and research. UNESCO established an International Bioethics Committee in 1993. What used to be called genocide will masquerade as social engineering administered by pseudo-scientific committees. In matters of life and death, the ruling elite will have the final word.


Chapter 14 End Notes:


1. Stanley Monteith MD, The Population Control Agenda, See 




3. Stanley Monteith MD, Radio Liberty Newsletter, November 2004. See


4. The Rockefeller University website. See                                                      


5 United Nations Population Fund website. See 


6 UNFPA Funding. See


7 Top 20 Donors to UNFPA in 2001, UNFPA. See


8 USAID MAP OF SHAME, Population Research Institute. See                   


9. Henry Kissinger, National Security Study Memorandum 200, 1974. See


10. Donald Mann President, Negative Population Growth Inc. Why We Need a Smaller U.S. Population and How We Can Achieve It, Position Paper, July 1992. See 


11. J. Kenneth Smail, Confronting The 21st Century’s Hidden Crisis: Reducing Human Numbers by 80%, Forum Series, Negative Population Growth, May 1995. See


12.Terence Kealey, “DDT is Safe”, The Daily Telegraph, London, 19 July 2001.


13. Marjorie Mazel Hecht, Bring Back DDT, and Science With It!, 21st Century Science and Technology Magazine, Summer 2002 issue. See


14. Hans Ruesch, The Drug Story.


15. Dr. Alexandra Niedzwiecki, Presentation to the Hague Tribunal, 14 June 2003. See 


16. Rockefeller Foundation website. See


17 Dr Leonard Horowitz, Death In The Air, Tetrahedron Publishing Group, 2001 p. 46.


18. Quick Facts, Rockefeller University website.


19. About Us, Aaron Diamond AIDS Research Centre website.


20. New International Partnership will improve AIDS Treatment in China, The Clinton Presidential Center, Press Release, 6 Nov. 2003. See


21 Research and Clinical Initiatives, Rockefeller University website. See


22 About HHMI, Howard Hughes Medical Institute website. See                     


23 Howard Hughes: Patron Of Science?, CBS, 23 Nov. 2003. See


24 About HHMI, op cit.. See


25 Quick Facts, Rockefeller University, op cit. 


26 Emerging Viruses: AIDS and Ebola, Nature, Accident or Intentional? Dr Leonard Horowitz, Tetrahedron Inc 1996, p.476


27 Rockefeller University archive. See                                                               


28. 2000 Annual Report, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center.


29. Nelson A. Rockefeller, 1908-1979, Rockefeller University archive. See


30. Phelps Memorial Hospital Center, The North County News, 1 August 2003.     


31. Memorial Sloan-Kettering at Phelps Memorial Hospital Center, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Centre website


32. Dr. Alexandra Niedzwiecki op cit.                                                             


33. History, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratories website.


34. Ibid., Historical Highlights.


35. Horowitz, Death in the Air, op cit., p.357 


36. G. Edward Griffin, World Without Cancer: The Story of Vitamin B17, American Media, second edition 1997, pp. 262-264


37.  Hans Ruesch, op cit.


38. Horowitz, Death in the Air, op cit., p.347                                                     


39. Rockefeller University archive, op cit.


40. Horowitz, Emerging Viruses, op cit., p.476. 


41. President’s Council, New York Academy of Sciences website. See


42 Barbara Starfield, Is US Health Really the Best in the World? JAMA. 2000;284:483-485. See


43. Just How Tainted Has Medicine Become:The Lancet (Vol. 359, No. 9313; 2002). See
 ( source by Dr Leonard Horowitz   


44 Antony Barnett, Revealed: how drug firms ‘hoodwink’ medical journals, The Observer, London, 7 Dec. 2003. See,6903,1101680,00.html
45. 51. Mark Benjamin, United Press International Investigates: The vaccine conflict, 20 July 2003, copy on See


46. Dr. Matthias Rath – Biography, Dr Rath Health Foundation website, see


47. Dr Matthias Rath, Complaint Against Genocide and Other Crimes Against Humanity Committed in Connection With The Pharmaceutical ‘Business With Disease’ And The Recent War Against Iraq. See


48.  EU Legislation,Alliance for Natural Health website. See                             


49. Dr Matthias Rath, The Documentation About “Codex Alimentarius” Who Is Behind The Codex Alimentarius?
50. Dr. Alexandra Niedzwiecki, op cit. 


51. G. Edward Griffin, World Without Cancer: The Story of Vitamin B17, American Media, second edition 1997, pp 40-41, 59-50


52. The Cancer Act 1939, U.K. See


53. The Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization websites. See


54. Harold E Buttram MD, The Controversy of the Latent Period Following Immunizations
21 Sept. 2001. See The Yurko Project website


55. Mark Benjamin, United Press International Investigates: The vaccine conflict, 20 July 2003, copy on See


56. Roman Bystrianyk, The Real Truth: Vaccination Inefficacy in the Reduction/Elimination of Infectious Diseases, copy on


57. Dr Russell Blaylock, author of Health and Nutrition Secrets That Can Save Your Life. See
Interviewed by Dr Stanley Monteith on Radio Liberty, 2 December 2003.


58. Vaccination Statistics, Dr Joseph Mercola.


59. The See                                                            


60. Harold E. Buttram, MD; Susan Kreider, RN; Alan R. Yurko. Vaccines and Genetic Mutation. 11 Oct. 2002. See


61. Measles meets its match, October 2003, Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization. See


62. Dr. Garth L. Nicolson and Dr. Nancy L. Nicolson, The Vaccine Controversy: Why Full Informed Consent Must be Instituted for All Vaccines, Criminal Politics, February 2001. See


63.Journal of Clinical Neuroscience 2002; 9:525-529. High Frequency of Systemic Mycoplasmal Infections in Gulf War Veterans and Civilians with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS).Garth L. Nicolson PhD1,2, Marwan Y. Nasralla PhD1,3, Joerg Haier MD, PhD 1,4. See


64. Dr Joseph Mercola, SV40, Polio Vaccine, and Cancer: Now Beyond Coincidence? See


65. The Center for Complex Infectious Diseases. 


66. Gordon L. Ada (Editor) P. D. Griffin (Editor), Vaccines for Fertility Regulation:The Assessment of Their Safety and Efficacy, Cambridge University Press, ISBN:0521392527, July 1991. See


67 see for the transcript
68. HcG Vaccine for Population Control, Tetrahedron Publishing Group. See        


69. UNICEF Nigerian Polio Vaccine Contaminated with Sterilizing Agents, Scientist Finds, Lifesite news, 11 March 2004.


70. Mercury, See 


71. Congressman Dan Burton, Press Release, California’s Autism Caseload Doubles in Four Years, 13 May 2003


72. Mark Benjamin, op cit.


73.  Kelly Patricia O Meara, CDC Study Raises Level of Suspicion, Insight on the News, 8 Dec. 2003. See


74. Press Release, Mothering Magazine warns Parents about Mercury in Flu Vaccines, 5 July 2004


75.  Mark Geier, M.D., Ph.D. and David. Geier, Thimerosal in Childhood Vaccines, Neurodevelopment Disorders, and Heart Disease in the United States, Journal of The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, April 2003.
76.Congressman Dave Weldon MD, letter to the CDC, 31 October 2003


77. Lisa Reagan ,Institute of Medicine Meets A Second Time to Review Vaccine/Autism Link, Mothering Magazine


78. Russell L. Blaylock, M.D.,What They Don’t Tell You About Vaccination Dangers Can Kill You or Ruin Your Life, newletter, 12 May 2004.


79. Blaylock RL. Chronic microglial activation and excitotoxicity secondary to excessive immune stimulation: possible factors in Gulf War Syndrome and autism. J Amer Phys Surg 9: 46-51, 2004.
 80. The Yurko Project. See


81. Viera Scheibner, Ph.D. Shaken Baby Syndrome Diagnosis On Shaky Ground, Journal of Australasian College of Nutritional & Environmental Medicine, Vol. 20 No. 2; August 2001. See


82. Robert C. Reisinger, D.V.M., SIDS: A final Mechanism.


83. Wider cot deaths review considered, BBC news on-line, 20 January 2004
84.Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) and Vaccination, CDC website


85. American Association of SIDS Preventing Physicians, website, March 2005 


86. Study Reveals Shaken Baby Syndrome Statistics in Scotland, Karen M. Barlow, MRCP (UK),
Royal Hospital for Sick Children


87. Mark Benjamin, op cit.


88. Dr. Garth L. Nicolson and Dr. Nancy L. Nicolson, The Vaccine Controversy: Why Full Informed Consent Must be Instituted for All Vaccines, Criminal Politics, February 2001. See


89. Horowitz, Death In the Air op cit., p.276


90. Report Criticizes French Hepatitis Vaccination Campaign, Reuters, 20 November 2002. See


91. Hep B vaccination trebles multiple sclerosis risk , Nursing Times, 9 September 2004, 


92. MMR and Autism: The Link Really Has been Established, What Doctors Don’t Tell You, September 2004


93. Goldman GS, Yazbak FE: An Investigation of the Association between MMR
Vaccination and Autism in Denmark. JAmPhysSurg 2004; 9(3):70-75


94. Horowitz op cit., p.277      
95. Garth L. Nicolson Ph.D. et al, The Pathogenesis and Treatment of Mycoplasmal Infections, Antimicrobics and Infectious Disease Newsletter (Elsevier Science) 1999; 17(11): 81-88. See


96. Dr Leonard Horowitz, Autism, Allergy, Asthma and Vaccine Induced Autoimmunity. See


97. Harold E. Buttram, MD; Susan Kreider, RN; Alan R. Yurko. Vaccines and Genetic Mutation. 11 Oct. 2002. See


98. Dr Russell Blaylock, interviewed by Dr Stanley Monteith on Radio Liberty, 2 December 2003.


99. Christine Gorman, The Fires Within,Time Magazine, 23 February 2004.


100. Sophie Goodchild and Steve Bloomfield, Children to get jabs against drug addiction, The Independent, 25 July  2004. See


101. Over 5200 Concerned Adults Refuse to Comply with New Freedom Initiative for Mental Health Screening in the Schools (PRWEB) October 21, 2004


102. Jeanne Lenzer, Bush plans to screen whole U.S. population for mental illness, 21 June 2004.


103. Schools in row over Ritalin, BBC, London, 24 July 2003.


104. Jon Henley, Depressed, moi? Why the French are driven to drugs, The Guardian, London, 8 Nov. 2003. See,11882,1080507,00.html


105. Implant ‘could cure migraines,’ BBC, London, 24 Feb. 2003. See                                                   


106. Microchip ‘could do away with pills’, BBC, London, 19 Oct. 2003. See


107. Horowitz, Death in the Air, op cit., pp.301-304 and Dr Begich’s article Star Wars, Star Trek and Killing Politely. See


108. Ibid., p.335


109.  Does TETRA pulse? Does it matter?, Tetrawatch website,


110. Ibid., p.223. 


111. Teen generation will be ‘world’s sickest adults’, The Daily Telegraph, London, 9 Dec. 2003. See


112. Garth L. Nicolson Ph.D. and Richard Ngwenya Ph.D, Dietary Considerations for Patients with Chronic Illnesses and Multiple Chronic Infections: A Brief Outline of Eighteen Dietary Steps to Better Health. See


113. Health Risks from Processed Foods and The Dangers of Trans Fats
Dr. Mary Enig Interviewed By Richard A. Passwater, Ph.D.


114. FX, the Campaign Against Trans Fats in Food


115. USDA / HSS 2005 guidelines : “Cut trans, TFX, the Campaign Against Trans Fats in Food.  


116. Dr Joseph Mercola, Aspartame: What You Don’t Know Can Hurt You. See


117. Racketeering (Rico)Charges filed Against NutraSweet, Dr. Moser of NS, American Diabetes Assn, Monsanto, Press Conf 9/16 A.M. Sacramento, PRWeb, 17 September 2004.



119.. Dr Russell Blaylock, op cit.


120.  Soy: Too Good to be True  
Brandon Finucan & Charlotte Gerson, Gerson Institute Newsletter Volume 14 #3


121.  Newest Research On Why You Should Avoid Soy
Sally Fallon & Mary G. Enig, Ph.D.


122. The Guardian, 13 August, 2000


123. The Trouble With Tofu: Soy and the Brain


124. Dr Russell Blaylock, Interviewed by Dr Stanley Monteith on Radio Liberty, 2 December 2003.


125. Report examines impact of phytoestrogens on health,


126. MacArthur op cit.


127. Fallon & Enig op cit.


128. Ibid


129. FAQs on Transexuality, Inland Revenue Diversity and Equality Unit, 2003


130. Transgender | Background / Facts & Figures, The Cabinet Office 


131. James Owen, Animals’ Sexual Changes Linked to Waste, Chemicals,National Geographic News
1st March 2004


132.Debbie Andalo, Public to make fluoride decision, The Guardian, 28 July 2004


133. Andy Kelly,We’ll Fight Fluoride Tooth and Nail, Warns Council, Daily Post, 02 August 2004


134. Stanley Monteith MD, Radio Liberty Newsletter. November, 2004. See


135. See Fluoride Alert website, 


136. Stanley Monteith MD, Radio Liberty Newsletter. November, 2004. See


137. Dr David Kennedy, interviewed on Radio Liberty, 30 December 2004.  Listen on-line at


138. China, India face Aids disaster, BBC, London, 3 July 2003.


139. Nicolson et al, op cit


140. Garth L. Nicolson Ph.D. et al, Summary of Persian Gulf War Illness Pilot Study on Mycoplasmal Infections in  Veterans and Family Members, National Forum for CFIDS/ME, FMS, GWI, MCS 1998.


141. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office website.  


142. Ibid p.65 Example 23


143. Journal of Clinical Neuroscience 2002; 9:525-529.
 High Frequency of Systemic Mycoplasmal Infections in Gulf War Veterans and Civilians with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS).Garth L. Nicolson PhD1,2, Marwan Y. Nasralla PhD1,3, Joerg Haier MD, PhD 1,4. See


144. Dr. Garth L. Nicolson and Dr. Nancy L. Nicolson, The Vaccine Controversy: Why Full Informed Consent Must be Instituted for All Vaccines, Criminal Politics, February 2001. See
145.FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 2002; 34:209-214, High Prevalence of Mycoplasma infections among European Chronic Fatigue Syndrome patients,Examination of four Mycoplasma species in blood of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome patients.Jo Nijs 1, MSc; Garth L Nicolson 2, PhD; Pascale De Becker 1, PhD; Danny Coomans 4, PhD;Kenny De Meirleir 1, 3, MD, PhD



146.Journal of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome 2003; 11(2): 7-19.
Evidence for Bacterial (Mycoplasma, Chlamydia) and Viral (HHV-6) Co-Infections in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Patients
Garth L. Nicolson,1 PhD, Marwan Y. Nasralla,2 PhD, Kenny De Meirleir,3 MD, PhD, Robert Gan,2 MB, PhD and Joerg Haier,4 MD, PhD


147. Luc Montagnier, Virus: The Co-discoverer of HIV Tracks Its Rampage and Charts the Future, ISBN 0-393-03923-4, New York, NY, WW Norton, 2000.


148. News, Institute of Molecular Medicine website. See                                  


149. Clinton Administration declares AIDS a security threat, CNN, 30 April 2000. See


150. Dr Leonard Horowitz, CIA oversees “war” on AIDS, Idaho Observer, July 2000. See 


151. Horowitz, Emerging Viruses, op cit., p.537


152. Osler’s Web, Hillary Johnson, Crown Publishers Inc. New York, 1996  
ISBN 0-517-70353-X


153. Ellen Tomson, Gulf War Illnesses Affect 300,000 Vets. PioneerPlanet / St. Paul (Minnesota) Pioneer Press, 19 Sept. 2000. See


154. Garth Nicolson Ph.D., Chief Scientific Officer, News, Institute of Molecular Medicine website. See


155. The Darker Bioweapons Future, The CIA, Press Release (reference OTI SF 2003-108 ) 
 3 Nov. 2003. See                     


156. Michael Meacher, This War on Terrorism is Bogus, The Guardian, London, 6 Sept. 2003. See    


157. Major Doug Rokke interviewed on Radio Liberty 12 Jan 05. Listen on-line at


158. Leuren Moret, World Affairs – The Journal of International Issues, 1 July 2004


159. Steven W. Mosher, President Population Research Institute, The Case Against UNFPA Funding, PRI Weekly Briefing, 11 January 2002 Vol. 4/ No. 2. See


160. 102 BBC Horizon, op cit.  


161. 5 reasons to keep Britain GM-free, The Ecologist Magazine, 22 June 2003. See


162. ProdiGene Receives National Institutes of Health Grant to Study Development Of Edible AIDS Vaccine, PRNewswire, 28 Nov. 2000. See


163. Airforce 2025, The Air University website.


164. Ibid., Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025.
Also, synopsis by Jon E. Dougherty, Air Force’s weather-modification plans,


165. Purpose and Objectives of the HAARP Program As stated in the Environmental Impact Statement, HAARP website. See 


166. Rosalie Bertell, Ph.D., GNSH, Background of the HAARP Project, Dr Begich’s EarthPulse website. See


167 HARRP Factsheet, HAARP website.


168. Background Art, Method and apparatus for altering a region in the earth’s atmosphere, ionosphere, and/or magnetosphere, U.S. patent no 4,686,605, 11 August 1987. Go to and type in the patent no. The patent is held by Advanced Power Technologies, formerly ARCO Power Technologies, a division of The Atlantic Richfield Oil Company


169. Dr Nick Begich and Jeane Manning, Vandalism In The Sky EarthPulse website. See


170. Gordon J. F. MacDonald, Unless Peace Comes,1968, ch. How to Wreck the Environment. See 


171. Report of The European Parliament Committee on Foreign Affairs, Security and Defence Policy, Minutes of 14 Jan.1999, Section 24, ref. A4-0005/1999, European Parliament website. See


172. See Thomas, Legislative information on the internet, 107th Congress and type in HR2977


173. Will Thomas, Chemtrails confirmed,


174. Stratospheric Welsbach seeding for reduction of global warming, go to U.S. Patent and Trademark Office website and type in patent no. 5,003,186. See



176. Get Ready for New ‘Nano’ Products, Reuters, 23 July 2003. See


177. National Nanotechnology Investment in the FY 2003 Budget Request by the President, The National Nanotechnology Initiative website. See                                                                       
178. World HIV and AIDS statistics, See and 
Divisions of HIV/AIDS Prevention, Centers for Disease Control.
 See  and World Population, The World Gazetter.


179. Frequently Asked Questions about Human Cloning and the Council’s Report,
The President’s Council on Bioethics. See


180. ‘First cloned human embryo ready’ ITV news, London, 19 Oct. 2003. See 


181. NHS euthanasia claims ludicrous’, BBC, London, 6 Dec.1999.


182. ‘Curb doctors’ life or death powers’, BBC, London, 28 April 2000.


183. Wesley J. Smith, Forced Exit, Times Books, 1997.


184. Patients must decide on resuscitation, BBC, London, 27 June 2000.


185. Cold Spring Harbour Laboratory website.  

To The Global Elite The Math Is Simple: Human Overpopulation Is Causing Climate Change So The Solution To Climate Change Is Population Control

October 14, 2010 1 comment

Today there is headline after headline in the mainstream media about how dangerous “climate change” is and about how the world as we know it is going to end if we don’t take dramatic steps to fight global warming.  But what they don’t tell you in the mainstream media is what the “final solution” for the problem of “climate change” that the global elite have come up with actually is.  You see, for the global elite the math is simple.  They believe that human overpopulation is causing climate change, and so the solution to climate change is population control.  As bizarre as that sounds, that is what they actually believe.  The truth is that they are convinced that climate change is going to literally destroy the earth and that the best way to fight climate change is to get rid of a whole bunch of us.

In fact, it is the official policy of the United Nations to fight climate change by promoting population control measures.  They don’t even try to camouflage it anymore.  Last year the UNFPA (the United Nations Population Fund) released its annual State of the World Population Report entitled “Facing a Changing World: Women, Population and Climate”, and in that document it was made clear that the official position of the UN is that the only way to avoid a major climate disaster is to dramatically increase “family planning” services around the globe and to do whatever is necessary to reduce worldwide fertility rates. 

Check out just a few of the quotes about the link between overpopulation and climate change contained in the UNFPA report….

*”The importance of the speed and magnitude of recent population growth in boosting future greenhouse-gas emissions is well recognized among scientists, including the authors of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s reports.”

*”Still, calculations of the contribution of population growth to emissions growth globally produce a consistent finding that most of past population growth has been responsible for between 40 per cent and 60 per cent of emissions growth.”

*”Each birth results not only in the emissions attributable to that person in his or her lifetime, but also the emissions of all his or her descendents. Hence, the emissions savings from intended or planned births multiply with time.”

*”No human is genuinely “carbon neutral,” especially when all greenhouse gases are figured into the equation. Therefore, everyone is part of the problem, so everyone must be part of the solution in some way.”

*”Strong family planning programmes are in the interests of all countries for greenhouse-gas concerns as well as for broader welfare concerns.”

No human is genuinely carbon neutral?

That means by being alive, we are all part of the problem.

To the elite, we are viewed as “useless eaters” that have multiplied to the point where we are now wildly out of control and are threatening to destroy the earth with our toxic carbon emissions.

And don’t think for a moment that the United Nations Population Fund is not a big time international organization.

They are active in virtually ever corner of the planet, they have the full backing of the United Nations, and thanks to Barack Obama they have 50 million U.S. taxpayer dollars with which to advance their eugenics agenda.

But it is not just the United Nations that is preoccupied with population control as a solution to global warming.

Bill Gates is absolutely obsessed with it.

In the video posted below, Bill Gates explains his belief that carbon emissions from humans are causing climate change, and that the only way to stop climate change is to reduce those carbon emissions to zero.

That is right. 

While you watch the clip, notice how many times he emphasizes the need to bring these carbon emissions down to zero.

So how does he propose to do this?

Well, one of his suggestions is to slow the growth of the population.

And how will that be accomplished?

In the video Bill Gates tells us exactly what his solution is….

“The world today has 6.8 billion people. That’s heading up to about nine billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 percent.”

Now wait a minute – aren’t vaccines supposed to keep people alive?

Wouldn’t more vaccines actually increase the population?

Or does Bill Gates know something that we don’t?

What Bill Gates has to say in this video is absolutely jaw dropping….

But of course Bill Gates is not the only one who is obsessed with climate change and population control.

In this next video, David Rockefeller explains how we are on the verge of a massive ecological disaster because there are too many people on the planet….

The truth is that while you and I may not give much thought to “overpopulation”, the global elite are truly obsessed with it. 

In fact, they even hold gatherings where they all get together and talk about it.  Just over one year ago Bill Gates, David Rockefeller, Warren Buffett, George Soros, Michael Bloomberg, Ted Turner, Oprah Winfrey and a number of other incredibly wealthy individuals held a secret meeting in New York.

So what was the topic of this secret meeting?

Population control.

One anonymous attendee of the meeting was quoted in a major U.K. newspaper as saying that overpopulation “is something so nightmarish that everyone in this group agreed it needs big-brain answers.”

Apparently they are the big brains that are going to figure out the best ways to make sure that there are fewer of the rest of us running around.

So the next time you hear about the incredible “threat” of climate change in the mainstream media, keep in mind what the global elite believe the ultimate solution to that threat is.

As Bill Gates said, they are not going to be satisfied until they get carbon emissions by humans down to zero.

And considering the fact that you have been breathing out carbon dioxide the whole time that you have been reading this article, that is not good news for you.

22 Shocking Population Control Quotes From The Global Elite That Will Make You Want To Lose Your Lunch

October 14, 2010 Leave a comment

Most Americans have absolutely no idea, but a very dark philosophy is spreading like wildfire among the global elite.  This philosophy is an obsessive belief that humanity has become a cancer that is destroying the earth.  There are now large numbers of global leaders that are convinced that the exploding population of the world has become like a virus or a plague, and that it must be combated as such.  In fact, it would be very difficult to understate just how obsessed many members of the global elite are with population control.  The United Nations puts out position papers about it, universities have entire courses dedicated to it, radical population control advocates have been appointed to some of the highest political positions in the world, and some of the wealthiest people on the planet get together just to talk about it.  Those who believe in this philosophy are constantly talking about the need for “increased access” to abortion, contraception and other “family planning” services.  But even with all of their efforts, the population of the world is still expanding and those who believe in this population control philosophy are getting nervous.

So just who are these people among the global elite who believe so fervently in population control?  Some of the names you are about to read below might totally shock you.  Many of them are some of the biggest names in the world.  For example, Prince Charles gave a major speech just the other day in which he bemoaned the rapidly expanding world population: “I could have chosen Mumbai, Cairo or Mexico City; wherever you look, the world’s population is increasing fast. It goes up by the equivalent of the entire population of the United Kingdom every year. Which means that this poor planet of ours, which already struggles to sustain 6.8 billion people, will somehow have to support over 9 billion people within 50 years.”

Many among the global elite believe that the growing world population is the number one problem facing the world.  Many of them are absolutely convinced that overpopulation is the primary cause of “climate change”, is ruining our environment, and threatens to turn the entire globe into one gigantic third world slum.

Of course all of that is nonsense, but this is what they actually believe, and the scary thing is that most of them are in positions of power and influence where they can actually do quite a bit to advance their insidious agenda. 

The following are 22 shocking population control quotes from the global elite that will make you want to lose your lunch….

#1) The March 2009 U.N. Population Division policy brief….

“What would it take to accelerate fertility decline in the least developed countries?”

#2) Microsoft’s Bill Gates….

“The world today has 6.8 billion people. That’s heading up to about nine billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 percent.”

#3) Barack Obama’s top science advisor, John P. Holdren….

“A program of sterilizing women after their second or third child, despite the relatively greater difficulty of the operation than vasectomy, might be easier to implement than trying to sterilize men.

The development of a long-term sterilizing capsule that could be implanted under the skin and removed when pregnancy is desired opens additional possibilities for coercive fertility control. The capsule could be implanted at puberty and might be removable, with official permission, for a limited number of births.”

#4) George W. Bush’s science advisor Paul Ehrlich….

“Each person we add now disproportionately impacts on the environment and life-support systems of the planet.”

#5) U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg….

“Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of.”

#6) A United Nations Population Fund report entitled “Facing a Changing World: Women, Population and Climate”….

“No human is genuinely ‘carbon neutral,’ especially when all greenhouse gases are figured into the equation.”

#7) David Rockefeller….

“The negative impact of population growth on all of our planetary ecosystems is becoming appallingly evident.”

#8) Jacques Cousteau….

“In order to stabilize world population, we must eliminate 350,000 people per day.”

#9) CNN Founder Ted Turner….

“A total population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal.”

#10) Dave Foreman, Earth First Co-Founder….

“My three main goals would be to reduce human population to about 100 million worldwide, destroy the industrial infrastructure and see wilderness, with it’s full complement of species, returning throughout the world.”

#11) Prince Phillip, the Duke of Edinburgh….

“If I were reincarnated I would wish to be returned to earth as a killer virus to lower human population levels.”

#12) David Brower, first Executive Director of the Sierra Club….

“Childbearing [should be] a punishable crime against society, unless the parents hold a government license … All potential parents [should be] required to use contraceptive chemicals, the government issuing antidotes to citizens chosen for childbearing.”

#13) Planned Parenthood Founder Margaret Sanger….

“The most merciful thing that a family does to one of its infant members is to kill it.”

#14) Planned Parenthood Founder Margaret Sanger. Woman, Morality, and Birth Control. New York: New York Publishing Company, 1922. Page 12….

“Birth control must lead ultimately to a cleaner race.”

#15) Princeton philosopher Peter Singer….

“So why don’t we make ourselves the last generation on earth? If we would all agree to have ourselves sterilized then no sacrifices would be required — we could party our way into extinction!”

#16) Thomas Ferguson, former official in the U.S. State Department Office of Population Affairs….

“There is a single theme behind all our work–we must reduce population levels. Either governments do it our way, through nice clean methods, or they will get the kinds of mess that we have in El Salvador, or in Iran or in Beirut. Population is a political problem. Once population is out of control, it requires authoritarian government, even fascism, to reduce it….”

#17) Mikhail Gorbachev….

“We must speak more clearly about sexuality, contraception, about abortion, about values that control population, because the ecological crisis, in short, is the population crisis. Cut the population by 90% and there aren’t enough people left to do a great deal of ecological damage.”

#18) John Guillebaud, professor of family planning at University College London….

“The effect on the planet of having one child less is an order of magnitude greater than all these other things we might do, such as switching off lights. An extra child is the equivalent of a lot of flights across the planet.”

#19) Professor of Biology at the University of Texas at Austin Eric R. Pianka….

“This planet might be able to support perhaps as many as half a billion people who could live a sustainable life in relative comfort. Human populations must be greatly diminished, and as quickly as possible to limit further environmental damage.”

#20) U.S. Secretary Of State Hillary Clinton….

“This year, the United States renewed funding of reproductive healthcare through the United Nations Population Fund, and more funding is on the way.  The U.S. Congress recently appropriated more than $648 million in foreign assistance to family planning and reproductive health programs worldwide. That’s the largest allocation in more than a decade – since we last had a Democratic president, I might add.”

#21) Clinton adviser Nina Fedoroff….

“We need to continue to decrease the growth rate of the global population; the planet can’t support many more people.”

#22) The first of the “new 10 commandments” on the Georgia Guidestones….

“Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature.”

The Real Story – Vaccines For Eugenics

October 9, 2010 Leave a comment

The Green Agenda Is About Getting Rid Of As Many Humans As Possible

October 6, 2010 Leave a comment

The American Dream
Oct 5, 2010

Most people tend to think of environmentalists as warm, cuddly hippies that just want all of us to love one another and to do what is right for the environment.  And in fact, there are a few people out there who are actually like that.  However, the people at the very heart of the green agenda are a quite different breed.  The truth is that there are a growing number of environmental activists (including some very, very famous people) who are publicly advocating the end of our freedoms, the establishment of a Big Brother style world government and the systematic eradication of at least 90% of humanity all for the good of the environment.  Unfortunately, this is not a joke and it is not an exaggeration.  As you will see below, these people are very, very serious.  To these eco-fascists, climate change is the number one threat to the earth, and in order to eliminate that threat “democracy must be put on hold”, an authoritarian world government must be established and we need to start getting rid of as many humans as possible. 

Posted below is a new video about the importance of fighting “climate change” that was recently released by a prominent global warming activist organization known as 10:10 Global.  This short video depicts children and adults being savagely blown to pieces for not reducing their carbon footprints.  The organization has since pulled the video and has issued an apology, but the fact that anyone would actually put out such a video is absolutely chilling.  In fact, there are many advocates of the green agenda who wish that they could actually press a button and do this kind of thing to “climate change deniers”….

Unfortunately, this type of thinking is not confined to just a few environmental nutcases.  For example, Microsoft billionaire Bill Gates is absolutely obsessed with global warming and with population control.

The video posted next contains excerpts from a speech that Gates gave at a recent TED conference.  As you watch this, keep in mind that Gates has personally donated hundreds of millions of dollars towards the development of new vaccines and towards “reproductive health” initiatives around the globe.

During his speech, Gates presents a formula for calculating the carbon dioxide that he believes is causing global warming….

CO2 = P x S x E x C

P = People
S = Services per person
E = Energy per service
C = CO2 per energy unit

In the video that you are about to watch below, Gates tells the audience that in order to get carbon dioxide levels on earth down to where they need to be, then “probably one of these numbers is going to have to get pretty close to zero.”

So which of those numbers is going to get pretty close to zero?

Will it be “P”?

In the video, Gates describes how the number of people might be reduced….

“The world today has 6.8 billion people… that’s headed up to about 9 billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 percent.”

Now wait a second.

Aren’t vaccines, health care and reproductive health services supposed to help people live longer?

Keep that question in mind as you watch this video….

There are others in the environmental movement who are even more open about what they feel needs to be done in order to save the planet from humanity.

For example, James Lovelock, the creator of the Gaia hypothesis, stated in an interview with the Guardian earlier this year that “democracy must be put on hold” if the fight against global warming is going to be successful and that only “a few people with authority” should be permitted to rule the planet until the crisis is solved.

A Finnish environmentalist named Pentti Linkola has gone even farther than that.  Linkola is openly calling for climate change deniers to be “re-educated”, for an eco-fascist world government to be established, for humans to be forcibly sterilized and for the majority of humans to be killed.

The following is how author Paul Joseph Watson recently described some of Linkola’s proposals….

Under Linkola’s proposal to save earth from man-made climate change, “only a few million people would work as farmers and fishermen, without modern conveniences such as the automobile.” This system would be enforced by the creation of a “Green Police” who would abandon “the syrup of ethics” that governs human behavior to completely dominate the population.

Linkola calls for forced abortions, while also adding that another world war would be “a happy occasion for the planet” because it would eradicate tens of millions of people. The environmentalist believes that only jackbooted tyranny can help to save mother earth from “the worst ideologies in the world” which he defines as “growth and freedom”.

Unfortunately, this kind of insanity does not just reside in Finland.

The reality is that academia is brimming with nutjobs such as this who want to see the vast majority of humanity wiped out.  

For example, Professor of Biology at the University of Texas at Austin Eric R. Pianka is another advocate of radical human population control.

In an article entitled “What nobody wants to hear, but everyone needs to know”, Pianka made the following shocking statements….

*First, and foremost, we must get out of denial and recognize that Earth simply cannot support many billions of people.

*This planet might be able to support perhaps as many as half a billion people who could live a sustainable life in relative comfort. Human populations must be greatly diminished, and as quickly as possible to limit further environmental damage.

*I do not bear any ill will toward humanity. However, I am convinced that the world WOULD clearly be much better off without so many of us.

Now keep in mind that this is a professor that is teaching our kids.  People actually pay a lot of money to get educated by this guy.

Unfortunately, his views are very much representative of the mainstream these days.

In fact, some of the wealthiest and most prominent people in the world are absolutely obsessed with the green agenda and with population control.  Just consider the following quotes….

David Rockefeller: “The negative impact of population growth on all of our planetary ecosystems is becoming appallingly evident.”

CNN Founder Ted Turner: “A total population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal.”

Dave Foreman, Earth First Co-Founder: “My three main goals would be to reduce human population to about 100 million worldwide, destroy the industrial infrastructure and see wilderness, with it’s full complement of species, returning throughout the world.”

Maurice Strong: “Isn’t the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn’t it our responsibility to bring that about?”

Michael Oppenheimer: “The only hope for the world is to make sure there is not another United States. We can’t let other countries have the same number of cars, the amount of industrialization, we have in the US. We have to stop these Third World countries right where they are.”

Not only that, but this radical population control agenda has actually reached the highest levels of the U.S. government.

In an absolutely shocking interview with the New York Times, U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg openly admitted that abortion is all about population control.  In particular, she confessed that abortion is about getting rid of “populations that we don’t want to have too many of”….

“Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of.”

So was she asked to step down from the Supreme Court?

Did anyone make much of a fuss?

No, Ginsburg is still serving on the Supreme Court and that statement is long forgotten.

You see, the truth is that this population control philosophy runs rampant throughout the highest levels of the U.S. government.

John P. Holdren, Barack Obama’s top science advisor, co-authored a textbook entitled “Ecoscience” back in 1977 in which he actually advocated mass sterilization, compulsory abortion, a one world government and a global police force to enforce population control.

On page 837 of Ecoscience, a claim is made that compulsory abortion would be perfectly legal under the U.S. Constitution….

“Indeed, it has been concluded that compulsory population-control laws, even including laws requiring compulsory abortion, could be sustained under the existing Constitution if the population crisis became sufficiently severe to endanger the society.”

On pages 942 and 943, a call is made for the creation of a “planetary regime” that would control the global economy and enforce population control measures….

Toward a Planetary Regime

“Perhaps those agencies, combined with UNEP and the United Nations population agencies, might eventually be developed into a Planetary Regime—sort of an international superagency for population, resources, and environment. Such a comprehensive Planetary Regime could control the development, administration, conservation, and distribution of all natural resources, renewable or nonrenewable, at least insofar as international implications exist. Thus the Regime could have the power to control pollution not only in the atmosphere and oceans, but also in such freshwater bodies as rivers and lakes that cross international boundaries or that discharge into the oceans. The Regime might also be a logical central agency for regulating all international trade, perhaps including assistance from DCs to LDCs, and including all food on the international market.”

“The Planetary Regime might be given responsibility for determining the optimum population for the world and for each region and for arbitrating various countries’ shares within their regional limits. Control of population size might remain the responsibility of each government, but the Regime would have some power to enforce the agreed limits.”

On page 917, the authors advocate the surrender of U.S. national sovereignty to an international organization….

“If this could be accomplished, security might be provided by an armed international organization, a global analogue of a police force. Many people have recognized this as a goal, but the way to reach it remains obscure in a world where factionalism seems, if anything, to be increasing. The first step necessarily involves partial surrender of sovereignty to an international organization.”

You see, that is what those obsessed with the green agenda want.

They want total control of us all so that they can impose the measures that they believe are necessary to “fix” the planet.

Unfortunately, the measures that they believe are necessary would make George Orwell’s 1984 look like a Sunday picnic.

And the sad thing is that the world is not anywhere close to overpopulated.  If you took 6 billion people and put them four to house on a quarter acre of land, you could fit them all in Alaska and still have room to spare.

I have actually written quite extensively in the past about the radical green agenda of the global elite.  If you are interested in learning more, I would recommend the following articles….

*The Green Police

*Governments Around The World Are Eagerly Adopting The Strict Population Control Agenda Of The United Nations

*Yes, They Really Do Want To Reduce The Population – 22 Shocking Population Control Quotes From The Global Elite That Will Make You Want To Lose Your Lunch

*The Dangerous Myth Of Overpopulation

*One Less Child? Environmental Extremists Warn That Overpopulation Is Causing Climate Change And Will Ultimately Destroy The Earth

*Hillary Clinton: Population Control Will Now Become The Centerpiece Of U.S. Foreign Policy

*New U.N. Report: We Must Reduce The Population To Fight Climate Change

*The Population Control Agenda Behind The Global Warming Movement: For The Environmental Extremists At Copenhagen Population Reduction Is The “Cheapest” Way To Reduce Carbon Emissions

*To The Global Elite The Math Is Simple: Human Overpopulation Is Causing Climate Change So The Solution To Climate Change Is Population Control

Death by Vaccination: The Gates Foundation and the New Eugenics

October 5, 2010 4 comments

Death by Vaccination: The Gates Foundation and the New Eugenics

Richard Gale & Gary Null

Progressive Radio Network September 22, 2010

While lecturing at the elitist TED 2010 conference in Long Beach, CA, Bill Gates slipped a statement while speaking on the dangers of climate change and over population: “Vaccines? I love them.” His admission was made in the context of his philanthropic strategy and, as we will see, vaccines play a dominant role in his firm conviction that population reduction is an urgent priority for the survival of humanity. Then the question is, who should be eliminated from the population? Who is elected from the public to make such decisions? The short answer is no one. Hence it is being done quietly thru foundations, international agencies and private industry.

Today the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is “the most powerful charity in the world, and one of the most quietly influential international organizations of any sort.”[1] The Foundation is funded to the tune of $34.6 billion plus an additional $30 billion from Warren Buffet’s investments. This is almost the entire budget of the World Health Organization (WHO).

Gates has followed in the footsteps of the Rockefellers’ lead to usher the New Green Revolution, an aggressive onslaught of genetically modified seeds (GMOs) to increase large scale corporate-influenced agriculture in Africa, India and elsewhere. The international GMO initiatives have devastated small cooperative farms that have served as the lifeline of food for centuries and as resulted in the deaths of hundreds of thousands of farmers. Of course nobody among the oligarchic elite, such as Gates, Rockefeller and Monsanto execs, will suffer from the consequences of this failed revolution.

However, it is vaccine research and development targeting Africa primarily, but also other developing nations, that holds center stage in his Foundation’s strategic funding. During the recent 2010 World Economic Forum, Gates announced he would spend $10 billion over the next ten years on child vaccine development for poorer nations.[2]. While calling this admirable might appear to be an understatement, which vaccines and which channels of funding rquire scrutiny in order to assess the value and motives of the Foundation’s mission.

In 2000, the Gates Foundation founded the International Finance Facility for Immunization (GAVI) and that organization’s Global Fund for Children’s Vaccines. GAVI is a global collaboration that includes governments, the Rockefeller Foundation, the World Bank, WHO, the International Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers, UNICEF, vaccine makers, and other influential entities. All of these are zealot vaccination promoters. The organization’s mission is to vaccinate every child in Africa. Through GAVI and its various programs, an estimated 250 million children in developing countries have already been vaccinated.[3] But the Foundation itself does not perform drug and vaccine research and development. In addition to traditional grant giving, it also provides lines of credit. For example, the International AIDS Vaccine Initiative received from the Foundation a $100 million line of credit to empower the nonprofit organization to influence HIV vaccine development within the vaccine industrial complex.[4]

Over the past several years, evidence is accumulating over Gates’ and his Foundations’ duplicity in saying one thing and acting otherwise. For example, frequently Gates has stated his opposition to Big Tobacco and claims he refuses to invest or fund any organization and company contributing to smoking. However, a recent investigation showed that the Foundation has in fact invested in Big Tobacco for quite some time.[5] Similarly, behind his verbiage on tackling climate change and shifting to non-fossil fuel technologies at the TED conference, Gates remains a heavy investor in Big Oil, particularly Exxon-Mobile and British Petroleum—perhaps the two oil companies the most corrupt history in recent decades.[6]

We appear, therefore, to be faced with a serious uncertainty over the public image of the very likable, mild-manner Bill Gates, who expresses repeatedly his ambition to improve the health of the developing world, and then the possibility of other ulterior motives that are contrary to saving lives. Should we take Gates and his Foundation’s word that their primary objective is to improve the health and well-being of children in poorer nations by fighting disease and illness with vaccines? Or is his vaccine agenda another ruse with a more sinister agenda? For example, it is hard to imagine that Gates is unaware that his commitment to the Green Revolution is in point of fact a Green Disaster and that no GMO has lived up to its promise. Yet he simply continues his enormous funding of agricultural genetic manipulation projects. Therefore, we believe there is sound reason that his Foundation’s many international vaccine initiatives represent much more than excessively kind-hearted charity.

Over the past several years, the prestigious British medical journal The Lancet has printed a series of in-depth analyses of the Gates Foundation with disturbing revelations. In a September 2008 article, “Misfinancing Global Health: A Case for Transparency in Disbursements and Decision Making,” the authors’ investigation came to the conclusion that aside from excessive funding of high profile Western institutions and organizations, there was “a heavy bias in funding towards malaria and HIV/AIDS, with relatively little investment into tuberculosis, maternal and child health, and nutrition–with chronic diseases being entirely absent from its spending portfolio.”[7] And a later study by Dr. David McCoy from the Center for International Health found that “the grants made by the Foundation do not reflect the burden of disease endured by those in deepest poverty.”[8] None of these findings have been covered to any extent by mainstream media nor any governing body.

No one can doubt Gates’ intellectual genius and talent/ Neither are we questioning his philanthropic endeavors that exceeds that of any other human being. So, then, why is his Foundation spending such wealth unwisely, and why is it ignoring far more effective and less costly solutions and practices for relieving the suffering of millions of children, women and men throughout the developing world?

In his deconstruction of Bill Gates’ charitable agenda, F. William Engdahl writes, “Vaccinating a child who then goes to drink feces-polluted river water is hardly healthy in any respect. But of course cleaning up the water and sewage systems of Africa would revolutionize the health conditions of the Continent.”[9] Far more effective would be the Foundation donating its billions to improve sanitation and hygiene, and provide nutrition to the 2.6 billion people who have none, for increasing clean water sources so 900 million global residents can have access to drinkable water (now at 1 in 3 Africans). Instead, the Foundation could be funding thousands of health clinics focusing on the chronic illnesses these populations suffer from most.[10] This is simply common sense. “Bad water,” says the Stockholm International Water Institute’s director, Anders Bentell, “kills more people than HIV, malaria and war together.”[11]

Spending billions of dollars to develop new vaccines and launch monumental efforts to vaccinate African children plagued with diverse infectious illnesses promises to be a fruitless enterprise while these populations continue to live in squalor. After decades of mass vaccination programs across Africa, current vaccines have neither proven their medical effectiveness and safety nor their ability to truly enhance the quality of life of impoverished Africans. Instead, as part of its Millennium Development Goal, the Foundation prefers to make its Rotavirus Vaccine Program to battle diarrheal diseases one of its two major focuses (in partnership with PATH, the WHO and the CDC).[12] The FDA has already announced warnings of Rotavirus vaccine’ life threatening adverse effects, such as intessusception or the severe twisting of children’s intestines that can lead to death.[13] Children in developing countries, already suffering from extreme immune-deficiencies due to malnutrition, lack of sanitary living conditions, and local diseases only have their bodies further weakened after any vaccination.

As a keynote speaker at the TED 2010 conference, Gates laid out his rationale for an international effort towards global depopulation. He said, “If we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that [projected to 9 billion people by 2050] by perhaps 10 or 15 percent” New vaccines for depopulation? What Gates might be referring to by “new vaccines” is the creation of new generation sterilizing and/or aborting vaccines with an ingredient or genetically engineered component that can go undetected. Vaccines to prevent pregnancy already exist; in fact, they have been with us for a long time. One area of vaccine research the Gates’ Foundation is funding in its Grand Challenges Explorations is the use of nano-particles.[14] Such engineered vaccines, with no gold standard for long term safety and efficacy, could virtually go undetected without highly advanced and expensive technologies to identify their presence.

As early as 1968, the Rockefeller Foundation’s annual report recommended anti-fertility vaccines as a viable means for lessening the human population growth rate that should be aggressively pursued.

The quandary lies in an ethical, moral and transparent means, which honor the free choice of the individual, for reducing the global birth rate. Unfortunately, past history shows that previous attempts to inoculate communities with anti-fertility vaccines have not only been unethical but covert and criminal. And when one thinks about it, what better way to lessen population growth, in addition to reducing years of life-expectancy, than through family planning vaccination programs spearheaded by government mandated international finance and health organizations, such as the World Bank, UNDP and WHO, and by willing governments and billionaires who are happy to help fund eugenic efforts? In addition, there are many powerful non-profit organizations, such as Save the Children and US Aid, who benefit handsomely from these multilateral institutions and rely upon their funding to carry out their demands.

An early anti-fertility trial using human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG), a hormone essential for pregnancy, in vaccines was completed in 1988 in India through a Rockefeller collaboration with India’s National Institute of Immunology. The Rockefeller annual report declared success. Yet according to Betsy Hartman, Director of Hampshire College’s Population and Development Program, “although one vaccine has been tested on only 180 women in India, it is being billed there as safe, devoid of any side effects and completely reversible.”[15]

Perhaps the most thorough documented investigation into the covert use of anti-fertility vaccines is a 1995 report, “Are New Vaccines Laced with Birth Control Drugs,” compiled by J.A. Miller, a correspondent for the pro-life missionary movement Human Life International. In the early 1990s, the WHO, supported by the Rockefeller Foundation, the World Bank, the UN Development Programme, and the US’s National Institutes of Health undertook stealth anti-fertility initiatives under the disguise of tetanus vaccination programs. These vaccines were administered to unsuspecting and poor communities in Mexico, Nicaragua and the Philippines.[16]

The tetanus vaccines, manufactured by Connaught and Intervex in Canada, and CSL, Ltd in Australia (a leading maker of the H1N1 flu vaccine that has been implicated in statistically significant numbers of seizures and heavily supported by the Rupert Murdoch family) were laced with hCG.[17] Scientists working on the project discovered that the tetanus vaccine was an ideal vehicle for introducing hCG peptides that when injected into a woman’s body would induce hCG antibodies thereby preventing pregnancy. In brief, a woman’s body turns on autopilot to attack her own natural production of hCG.[18]

All would have gone well for the scheme’s masterminds if it were not for individuals working in local religious charities having observed some highly suspicious procedures. For example, why were only women between the ages of 15 to 45 receiving the tetanus shot and no men? And why were multiple booster shots required during the following months when a single tetanus injection is well-known to provide protection for ten years? In the Philippines, laboratory results of vaccinated woman in almost all cases discovered the presence of hCG antibodies; lab investigations into the vaccines uncovered the presence of hCG; and a subsequent investigation found that none of the hCG-laced vaccine lots had been registered with the government’s Bureau of Food and Drugs. The episode was entirely a black op, a super human stealth experiment preying upon poor innocent women.[19]

While the above is the best documented example, other less well known eugenic experiments during the 1990s using anti-fertility vaccines have been conducted in Haiti and among the Akha people in Thailand, in poorer African-American neighborhoods in Los Angeles, and among indigenous people in North and Latin America.

A 1995 BBC documentary, “The Human Laboratory,” interviewed Filipino women’s activist Mary Pilar Verzosa, who reported on the vaccine’s adverse effects. These included fertility cycles that were “all fouled up,” spontaneous bleeding and miscarriages.[20] Seemingly, women were not screened to determine whether or not they were pregnant before injections. Consequently in addition to interfering with a woman’s ability to become pregnant the WHO was launching a clandestine experiment to observe whether the vaccine would trigger miscarriages.

No published studies exist for long-term follow up on women receiving hCG-laced vaccines and associated severe adverse effects. Given the WHO’s past record of seriously flawed misjudgments and secrecy–their recent fabrication of a level-6 H1N1 pandemic being an excellent recent example–and those of the other organizations complicit in covert vaccine operations, we should not be surprised that such studies exist. Because the hCG hormone is involved in many other bodily functions besides pregnancy, it is likely that artificially creating hCG antibodies in a woman would result in a cascade of serious incurable health problems. The hormone plays an important role in endocrine functioning of the brain’s hypothalamus. It is a known diagnostic marker for certain types of tumors. Artificially interfering in its production could potentially cause any number of different cancers. Since hCG is essential for healthy pituitary gland function, such toxic vaccines would interfere with this master gland’s regulatory function of maintaining homeostatic balance, hormonal equilibrium, throughout the body’s endocrine system. There can be an incalculable number of adverse conditions resulting from such a vaccine.

If used with the wrong motives, vaccines can e excellent devices for lessening lifespan. In addition, there are unanswered questions about how safe and effective vaccines actually are. For example, a child will not develop cancer or acquire a chronic autoimmune dysfunction a week or two after receiving a flu or measles injection. Yet, vaccines, especially those relying upon animal tissue to culture viruses during the manufacturing process—the influenza, the MMR, and yellow fever vaccines—are known to be highly contaminated with foreign animal viruses (including Avian Leukosis Virus and Equine Arteritis Virus), genetic fragments of such viruses, oncogenes (genes that turn normal cells cancerous), and prions (tiny proteins responsible for incurable diseases and neurological disorders in animals and humans). Public awareness of this fact appeared in transcripts from private meetings of the Center for Disease Control’s Vaccine and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee and the Evolving Scientific and Regulatory Perspective Workshop in 1998 and 1999 respectively and obtained by British investigative journalist Janine Roberts.[21]

According to the committees’ participants representing, “the largest public health institutions in the West,” it is impossible to remove DNA contaminants from vaccines. When the question was raised whether or not vaccine DNA contamination could cause cancer or autoimmune disease, one respondent stated, “when you consider that almost every one of these vaccines is injected right into the tissue… I think you couldn’t do much more to get the DNA expressed [to get contaminating cancer-causing DNA taken up by human cells] than to inject it into a muscle in the way it’s being done.”[22]

Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, Chairman of the health committees in the German Parliament and the European Council, reported that Novartis was using a “nutrient solution” relying on cancer-cell lines in a bioreactor to manufacture its H1N1 vaccine. He issued warnings that adverse reactions to this kind of engineered vaccine are unknown.[23]

Bill Gates’ mission to protect poorer populations from disease through mass vaccination, his sense of urgency that the global population is too large and needs to be reduced, and his deep financial and collaborative enterprises with the oligarchic elite, health agencies and multilateral organizations with a past history of eugenic intentions and experimentation, make for a bizarre mix that raises serious questions about the truth behind his Foundation’s motives.

America has a long history of eugenic science through the first half of the twentieth century–John D. Rockefeller, Margaret Sanger, Paul Popenoe, Madison Grant and others. The names of the organizations and facilities they founded or supported tells the story. Andrew Carnegie’s Institute was the primary funder of the Eugenics Record Office that operated from the Cold Spring Harbor Laboratories. The Laboratory was closed in 1944 after the public became aware of thousands sterilizations it oversaw.

Likewise the Rockefellers were major funders of not only Cold Spring Harbor but also the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Eugenics, which became the center of the Nazi’s extermination experiments. The Rockefellers’ Population Council, with the mission to advance birth control, was first headed by Frederick Osborn, a leader in the American Eugenics Society.[24] And there is no reason to believe America’s eugenic tradition has died out, although it has mutated into what might appear to be a less malignant form compared to the days when over half of the fifty states were conducting forced sterilization on poor woman and inmates in prisons and mental insitutes.

Nobody should doubt the eugenic agenda remains alive and well in America. In fact, behind the closed corridors among the global elite, it is gaining fuel. For these people, sacrificing poor people in the developing world on the altar of a distorted Manifest Destiny, and setting their own rules in modern technologies–vaccines and GMO seeds–with the potential to destroy every unborn child is simply racism and bigotry. Kenyon College anthropologist Ken Smail, in a 2004 World Watch article, wrote, “That there will be large scale reduction in global human numbers over the next two or three centuries appears to be inevitable. The primary issue seems to be whether this process will be under conscious human control and (hopefully) relatively benign, or whether it will turn out to be unpredictably chaotic and (perhaps) catastrophic.”[25]

The weakness in today’s elites’ depopulation agenda is fourfold. First it has always been the poorer, less educated segments of humanity that should be reduced and no one else. Therefore, second, since they cannot be allowed to have a freedom of choice or vote on the matter, the elites must make this decision for them. Third, their argument crumbles since it is the elites themselves that place value on one particular life as being different than another. And finally, since depopulation cannot be executed transparently, it must be done through deceit and clandestine means.

So what are the lessons to be learned from this? The wealthiest elite on the planet are rarely questioned about the correctness of their actions and schemes. As long as one of these individuals say they are giving huge sums of money to a cause to end disease and suffering, we are not suppose to probe further. Rather, in the case of mainstream media, such people are to be worshiped as saviors. The oligarchic elite are so well interconnected on multiple boards of directors, clubs for the rich and powerful, think tanks, and among the high ranks of elected legislators and politicians that it is difficult to have an open and honest debate on the merits of their actions and spending. When a Ted Turner says we should reduce the world’s population by more than half, and Bill Gates suggests a 15 percent reduction, do we really understand they are following a form of eugenic genocide?


[1] Beckett, Andy. “Inside the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.” Guardian UK. July 12, 2010.

[2] Engdahl, F. William. “Bill Gates Talks about Vaccines to Reduce Population.” Financial Sense Editorials. March 4, 2010.

[3] “Gates Foundation Decade of Vaccines.” The Lancet. March 2010. Vol. 10. No. 3. p. 39

[4] Beckett, Andy. Op cit.

[5] Schestowitz, Roy. “Gates Foundation Retreats After Being Exposed as Funder of Big Tobacco.” April 19, 2010.

[6] Schestowitz, Roy. “Bill Gates Invests Heavily in Deception about Global Warming and in Abusive Monopolies.” February 22, 2010.

[7] “What has the Gates Foundation Done for Global Health,” The Lancet. Vol. 373, no. 9675. May 9, 2009

[8] Ibid.

[9] Engdahl, F. William. Op cit.

[10] Deen, Thailif. “Summit Failure on Water, Sanitation Would be Recipe for Disaster,” September 14, 2010

[11] Deen, Thailif. “Time Running Out Faster than Water, Experts Warn,” IPS News. September 6, 2010

[12] GAVI Alliance.

[13] “New Rotavirus Vaccine Danger: FDA Warns as Possibly Life-Threatening for your Child” Health and Wellness. February 13, 2007

[14] Butler, Byron. “Gates Foundation donates $7.8 million to global initiatives.” The Daily Tell. May 14, 2010

[15] Maessen, Jurriaan. “Rockefeller Foundation Developed Vaccines for “Mass-Scale” Fertility Reduction.” Infowars. August 5, 2010.

[16] Miller, JA. “Are New Vaccines Laced with Birth Control Drugs?” Human Life International Reports, Vol. 13, No. 8, June/July 1995

[17] Centers for Disease Control. “ACIP Recommendation for Use of CSL Influenza Vaccine.” CDC Press Release, August 5, 2010

[18] Miller, JA. Op cit.

[19] Ibid.

[20] Taylor, Daniel. “Vaccinate the World: Gates, Rockefeller Seek Global Population Reduction.” Global Research. September 7, 2010.

[21] Gale, R, Null G. “Vaccines’ Dark Inferno: What is not on Insert Labels” Global Research. September 29, 2009; also see, Roberts, Janine. Fear of the Invisible: How Scared Should We be of Viruses and Vaccines. Impact Investigative Media Productions: Bristol UK, 2009

[22] Ibid.

[23] “Does Virus Vaccine Increase the Risk of Cancer.” (Germany) September 7, 2009

[24] Taylor, Daniel. “Eugenics Moves to the Twenty-First Century,” Old-Thinker News. August 27, 2007

[25] Smail, Ken. “Global Population Reduction: Confronting the Inevitable,” World Watch. September/October, 2004

Bill Thompson
TV, Inc.
Clearwater, FL

%d bloggers like this: